Topic: Terran Empire Subjugator-Class, ISS Tiberius (Read 16402 times)

J. Carney · « **Reply #40 on:** December 07, 2004, 08:29:29 pm »

GAWD!!!

Those nacalles look big enough to SWALLOW a Connie!

Hexx · « **Reply #41 on:** December 07, 2004, 10:11:30 pm »

Alll fantastic looking.. I must be the only person who has never really liked the third nacelle though..

Has anyone ever done any series of Standard Fed ships retexture as Terran Empire?
I found a few, but they were kinda old and not very high poly.

Azel · « **Reply #42 on:** December 08, 2004, 01:13:49 pm »

Quote from: Hexx on December 07, 2004, 10:11:30 pm

Alll fantastic looking.. I must be the only person who has never really liked the third nacelle though..

Has anyone ever done any series of Standard Fed ships retexture as Terran Empire?
I found a few, but they were kinda old and not very high poly.

I actually don't care for more than 2 nacelles myself...but if its done in good taste then I am cool with it...the only 3 nacelle ship I drew in this thread is the Usurper...the Warbringer has 4 as it is done in the SFB Mars style

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #43 on:** December 08, 2004, 01:48:53 pm »

I'm still stubborn to my beliefs about the Mirror Universe, but aside from all that and the debates (now that they're finished), and with suspension of belief, those are nice designs you've done, and I really like 'em, Atolm.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #44 on:** December 08, 2004, 03:11:20 pm »

-=looks at dictator....dies=-

Azel · « **Reply #45 on:** December 08, 2004, 03:40:03 pm »

OK here's my take on the ISS Enterpise...Anarchist-Class:

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #46 on:** December 08, 2004, 04:18:05 pm »

-=gets up...looks at anarchist...dies again=-

Seriously though, great ships. i love em.

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #47 on:** December 08, 2004, 05:19:59 pm »

The Anarchist-class definately fits onto the idea of a "Mirror Universe" in my opinion (of things looking the same, yet different, especially much more on the inside than on the outside) and looks quite amazing.

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #48 on:** December 08, 2004, 05:29:02 pm »

I do ask one thing, for the guy who ends up modelling these (hell just model the Tiberius, ill kitbash the others) I read somewhere about changing the "NCC" to "ZCC" and i kinda liked that...any ideas?
"USS ENTERPRISE ZCC-1701 Anarchist-Class"

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #49 on:** December 08, 2004, 05:31:43 pm »

I would've thought "I.S.S. Enterprise ICC-1701", a little bit like the I.S.S. Ent-D's name and registry in the novel "Dark Mirror".

FoaS_XC · « **Reply #50 on:** December 08, 2004, 05:33:43 pm »

too many I's, IMHO

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #51 on:** December 08, 2004, 05:34:44 pm »

Blame Diane Duane for that, as well as a great novel that tells a story better than any writer on most Star Trek shows.

Azel · « **Reply #52 on:** December 08, 2004, 07:42:16 pm »

'NCC" is just a designation for the registry...there would be no need for an "I" to be involved...
But noncanonically the prefix NCC stands for Naval Construction(or Contracting) Corp ... If I recall correctly

Chris Johnson · « **Reply #53 on:** December 08, 2004, 08:06:01 pm »

I think it's known as "Naval Construction Contract" or "Naval Commission Contract"... I think Atra came up with the latter. But the "ICC" would make sense in form of the registry meaning "Imperial Construction Contract", yes? No? *shrug*

J. Carney · « **Reply #54 on:** December 08, 2004, 08:06:23 pm »

Quote from: Azel on December 08, 2004, 07:42:16 pm

'NCC" is just a designation for the registry...there would be no need for an "I" to be involved...
But noncanonically the prefix NCC stands for Naval Construction(or Contracting) Corp ... If I recall correctly

Naval Construction Contract

http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&Acronym=ncc

I personally think that the NCC would have stayed, because they are both 'naval' connstruction contracts, reguardless of which government approved them.

But ICC works just as good- after all, we are making this up as we go along!

Azel · « **Reply #55 on:** December 09, 2004, 01:12:26 pm »

I personally like NCC then ISS so it does not look so weird with ICC, then ISS
so I say: Anarchist-Class ISS Enterprise, NCC-1701

Lord Schtupp · « **Reply #56 on:** December 09, 2004, 02:36:44 pm »

I really like your take on the ISS connie.

Azel · « **Reply #57 on:** December 09, 2004, 03:49:22 pm »

Quote from: Lord Schtupp on December 09, 2004, 02:36:44 pm

I really like your take on the ISS connie.

Is that a lobby to make it???...LOL
Glad you like her mate

Azel · « **Reply #58 on:** December 09, 2004, 03:50:46 pm »

OK here's my take on the ISS Enterprise-D
Oppressor-class:

J. Carney · « **Reply #59 on:** December 09, 2004, 04:30:40 pm »

She looks more, uhm... *looks for a delicate way to say this about a lady* 'round, firm, and fully packed' than the Feddy version.

I like the way that you bulked her up a bit- the Ent-D was always a little flimsy looking in my mind. It also adds to the menace... more room to pack more weapons and marines...

I wonder what the power bill for all the agonizer booths on that girl runs!

News:

Topic: Terran Empire Subjugator-Class, ISS Tiberius (Read 16402 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

Topic: Terran Empire Subjugator-Class, ISS Tiberius (Read 16402 times)