Poll

On a "hypothetical" server, which CnC option is better?

The below CnC rules
4 (30.8%)
One Ship per pilot is better
9 (69.2%)

Total Members Voted: 13

Topic: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll  (Read 3958 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
"Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« on: November 29, 2004, 12:06:36 am »
Hull Size:

For the purpose of CnC/OOB classification, below are ship size classes:

BB (2 Move Cost)
DN/CVA (1.5 Move Cost)
BCH/CA/NCA (1 Move Cost)
CL, HDW (K-D6 variants)
DD/DW
FF


CnC Rules:
All Bombardment Ships, Fast Cruisers, and HDWs must be flown solo.

Command Cruisers:

Pilots may fly 2 ships. The first ships must be a command cruiser and the second ship is a vanilla-line ship of the same Hull Class or smaller.
EXAMPLE: K-C7, K-D5W and F-CLC, F-NCL+ are legal combos.

True Carriers and Tenders:

Pilots may fly one ESCORT ship with the carrier/tender provided it is 2 Hull Class sizes smaller than the Carrier.
EXAMPLE: F-NCV, F-DWA, and K-C7V, K-FWE are legal combinations.

Only ESCORTS may escort a carrier/tender
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


762_XC

  • Guest
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2004, 12:26:05 am »
Some races really get screwed by 2 ships. 1 per pilot is always better IMHO.

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26163
  • Gender: Male
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2004, 01:36:45 am »
I think it depends on the server there is room for both as well as other options.  The whole package must be taken into consideration before a blanket statement of one way being better is made.

Offline Lepton

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1620
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2004, 01:58:42 am »
Seems like an OK system, but how it is different or better than any other system is up for debate.  It seems simplicity is the watchword here, but is that a good thing?  Isn't there some overly complicated SFB-like system that could be imposed that would be more "realistic"?  I personally would like to see a system that allowed for 3 ship fleets but wherein each ship is flown by a single player such that a CnC/OoB becomes the basis for player cooperation and role-playing elements, rather than more ships for one person to smash into another person like a Matchbox car crash.


System Specs:

Dell Dimension E521
AMD64x2 5000+
2G DDR2 RAM
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB GDDR3
250GB SATA HD

Offline KBF-Soth

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 113
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2004, 02:20:18 am »
I agree with Lepton's system oevr the first 1

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2004, 03:20:27 am »
I personally would like to see a system that allowed for 3 ship fleets but wherein each ship is flown by a single player such that a CnC/OoB becomes the basis for player cooperation and role-playing elements, rather than more ships for one person to smash into another person like a Matchbox car crash.

I would prefer this myself, all of the Cheesy combos you see in 2v2 and 3v3 on Dyna are SFB illegal.  This unfortunately is not technically possible in the D2 system.  Drafting is too random, if we were in some way able to add the Fleeting of D3 then this would be really cool.

We have to deal with realistic options, and Lepton's unfortunately is not one of them.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline WarSears

  • <MEAN FACE> @ Nail
  • Hot and Spicy
  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 355
  • Gender: Male
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2004, 09:34:41 am »
Some races really get screwed by 2 ships. 1 per pilot is always better IMHO.

I cant believe this but I agree with 762 one ship pre pilot is best. ;D
War-Sears
Klingon Black Fleet



Offline GDA-S'Cipio

  • Brucimus Maximus
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 5749
  • Gender: Male
  • If I took the bones out, it wouldn't be crunchy.
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2004, 10:00:06 am »

I'm of two minds here.

On the one mind, multiple ships simply work lightyears better for some races than they do for others.  And I know that my race is on the short end of that stick.

On the other mind  (the lazy lizard mind, which refuses to think ahead about consequences) it's been a long time since we had a server that let you fly more than one ship that wasn't a PF squadron.  And this system of CnC is better than most, especially with your list of ships that must be flown solo.

Why not give it a shot and see what happens?  (Though I think you need to stick in a fighter and PF CnC as well.)

-S'Cipio
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."  - James Madison (chief author of the Constitution)

-----------------------------------------
Gorn Dragon Alliance member
Gorn Dragon Templar
Coulda' used a little more cowbell
-----------------------------------------


Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2004, 10:04:06 am »

I'd change that around a tad. I think you have too much iron for one Captain the way it is now. I'd add BC's in with ships that have to be flown solo. I'd further stipulate that you have to have a CA/NCA command ship and the largest size second ship would be a DD or DW or smaller. That would tone down the uber factor. Same with full carriers or tenders. A DD or DW or smaller 2nd ship.

The idea is to give line cruisers the ability to compete with the big boys... If we even have to go so far as to appoint FM's for multiship fleets, then so be it, as I can imagine very few would opt to fly such a configuration. But it would make things interesting... Very interesting...

Offline Kroma BaSyl

  • Romulan Tart
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Don't hate me because I'm beautiful.
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2004, 10:07:03 am »

Pilots may fly one ESCORT ship with the carrier/tender provided it is 2 Hull Class sizes smaller than the Carrier.
EXAMPLE: F-NCV, F-DWA, and K-C7V, K-FWE are legal combinations.

Only ESCORTS may escort a carrier/tender


Only 1 hull size smaller, otherwise to restrictive for some races. I would also allow escorts or vannilla for carriers/tenders, as sme races escorts are next to worthless.
♥ ♥ ♥  GDA Kroma BaSyl  ♥ ♥ ♥
GCS Prima Ballerina
GCS PHAT Gorn
GCS Queen Kroma


Because this game makes me feel like  a thirteen year old girl trapped in a lizards body.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2004, 10:59:32 am »

Why not give it a shot and see what happens?  (Though I think you need to stick in a fighter and PF CnC as well.)

-S'Cipio

You are right, I will give this or something similar a shot on a small fun server, not a major campaign. 
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2004, 11:08:29 am »

I'd add BC's in with ships that have to be flown solo.

I don't see the logic of ships with a 10 command rating being forced to fly solo.  ;D



The idea is to give line cruisers the ability to compete with the big boys... If we even have to go so far as to appoint FM's for multiship fleets, then so be it, as I can imagine very few would opt to fly such a configuration. But it would make things interesting... Very interesting...

Maybe dropping the "second" ship to a hull class lower would work better.   Either way, I fairly certain this should not be "tested" on a major campaign a such ideas in the past were bad ideas.

How about a fun server where you MUST fly 2 ships?   ;D
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline KBF-Nail

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 276
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2004, 11:10:46 am »
How about a server with nothing but Frigs. WOuld be fun hehe. Dont mind me IM just rambling

Offline FPF-Wanderer

  • Order of Battle Wonk
  • Hot and Spicy
  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 354
  • Gender: Male
  • Trek Nerd Since 1976
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2004, 11:14:41 am »
How about a server with nothing but Frigs. WOuld be fun hehe. Dont mind me IM just rambling

AHHHHHHH!!!! Frigate Hell II! <runs away>...
Alliance SAC, SG4 / Alliance SAC, RDSL / Federation A/RM: AOTK, SSII, GW4 / Federation Chief of Staff / Member of the Flying Circus / Alliance Map Guy

Offline GDA-S'Cipio

  • Brucimus Maximus
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 5749
  • Gender: Male
  • If I took the bones out, it wouldn't be crunchy.
Re: "Hypothetical" D2 Server CnC poll
« Reply #14 on: November 29, 2004, 12:30:44 pm »
How about a server with nothing but Frigs.

Only a bastard would suggest a server with nothing but frigs.

<Notices this is Nail.>

Oh, right.  Nevermind.

-S'Cipio
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."  - James Madison (chief author of the Constitution)

-----------------------------------------
Gorn Dragon Alliance member
Gorn Dragon Templar
Coulda' used a little more cowbell
-----------------------------------------