Topic: Alamo, Wild Rover, Orbiter and Lewis classes for sfc2

[Mackie]

sorry guys, i forgot to post about it here ;p

Alamo class

http://www.the-tcs.net/dldir/pafiledb.php?action-file&id=186

Wild Rover class

http://www.the-tcs.net/dldir/pafiledb.php?action=file&id=185

Orbiter class carrier/tug

http://www.the-tcs.net/dldir/pafiledb.php?action-file&id=184

Lewis class carrier

http://www.the-tcs.net/dldir/pafiledb.php?action=file&id=183

more to come!

credits go to desty_nova and lord schtupp, as conversions, thanks to Atheorhaven as per usual

[Rogue]

Very nice. The Lewis class should go into service as an auxilliary carrier immediately.

[J. Carney]

I still sat that this is a far better CVA than the ADB design...

Well done, Mackie.

[battlestar001]

are there SFC 3 realeases?

[Mackie]

well if anyone wants to work im into sfc3 releaseable versions ill be happy to credit and put em  up!

[Wolfsglen]

Very nice! Thank you. 

[Chris Johnson]

Something needs to protect those conduit thingies that go from the back of the ship (from the impulse engines) to the back of the saucer, looks like you can easily take it out and disable impulse. *shrug* But nonetheless it's still a fine design.  Not like everyone decided to take a shot at the bridge all the time. lol

Once again, nice work Mackie.  I really like the TOS Carrier.  Although all the designs are good, I'm a bit more partial to that.

[Dizzy]

WHOOOO!

 

[zerosnark]

Although "advertised" as an Aux CVA, it just seems like this sucker has too big of a saucer and the engines are too serious for an auxillary.

In my mind, this ship should be considered a CVA, OR perhaps given that large internal volume, a self escorting troopship loaded with scads of assault shuttles.

[Mackie]

well its still just a freighter refitted into a carrier , i dont know what category it would fall under ;p