Check out XenoCorp.Net's FTP site !! Over 10 GB of gaming files for your downloading pleasure: ftp.xenocorp.net
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
Not sure I can be bothered, but as you are the Doc, can you run an AI standard patrol in 2 minutes in a KRC? If so, there is no problem and I am utterly wrong. If you cannot, then the KRC is a worse ship for AI missions than ones I know can.
Well that's a nice long cut and paste, pity you didn't read the rest of the site that you found the link for. You will see though that they created the Eleventh Fleet first.
You know, WaterTiger, if you were to take every post that you've ever made on these forums and delete them, nothing constructive would be lost. How sad is that, man?
And yes, Age ... I was referring to the BCG. I'm tired, Cleavan has worn me out. I think he took a nap. I never got one.
There is no F-BFG in SFB. Please check your references and try again.
Quote from: Cleaven on July 31, 2004, 03:41:16 amWell that's a nice long cut and paste, pity you didn't read the rest of the site that you found the link for. You will see though that they created the Eleventh Fleet first. I read it. It is irrelevant.And you are totallly OTT. This was locked in another thread. It has been asked and answered.Now, the F-BFG?Explain that Mr. SFB purist, please, as it applies to the use of plasma on a FEDERATION vessel.<S>
Quote from: Rod ONeal on July 31, 2004, 03:42:25 amYou know, WaterTiger, if you were to take every post that you've ever made on these forums and delete them, nothing constructive would be lost. How sad is that, man?That is the whole point Rod. The same could be said for every, single one of you.Get some popcorn. Enjoy the show.<S>
Quote from: Rod ONeal on July 31, 2004, 03:46:08 amThere is no F-BFG in SFB. Please check your references and try again.EAW/OP, Rod, keep up .. The game as it applies to the show. You just wake up? Go back and read the thread, then catch up. Thanks!
Quote from: EFF Age on July 31, 2004, 03:36:09 amQuote from: FPF-Jem on July 31, 2004, 03:23:55 amOK, I'll post his here, I posted something similar in another thread but it probably wasn't read.I'm not a SFB player, and could care less about SFB. I do however vastly prefer OP over 3. I have tried 3 but I just can't get the same enthusiasm for it as I can for any of the older titles. It's not a matter of ship models or race, its just a matter of content, OP has much more for me than 3 and it doesn't have that infernal AV(I'm totally in agreement with Cleaven on that point, AV gives me a sour taste). I didn't buy those games for a Trek game, I bought them looking for a Space ship Battle simulator.As far a shunning of 3 goes, I don't think its anything more than the fact that most of those still in the OP section have tried it and just don't care much for it to switch, and to be blunt as some have pointed out, some in the 3 crowd don't seem to like us (or rather the game we like, OP) much either and aren't shy of making it known, which to be fair has probably affected my view of 3. What would be involved in drawing both communities together anyway? I am curious what this means to both you WT and Nanner, what would you like to see thats different now as far as the games go? Other than sharing mod/server-setup ideas perhaps I can't think of anything that would change?P.S. The BCG doesn't have plasma, the BCF does and rockets are a Cannon weapon in Star Trek, there just aparently obselete by TNG and theres no evidence of them being emplaced on Fed vessels, (though I don't think there's much evidence saying they weren't either ). However I fail to see how this is relevant in the current discussion anyway.I have never seen or read about missles being used in Star Trek niether TOS or TMP.I have read Star Trek novels.I already answered the F-BCG .Their existence was mentioned in an early episode of TNG. They were also described as outdated and were of Rekellian origin? some small race at anyrate but were aparently effective enough to destroy completly a Klingon warship with its shields down. I believe it's in the first season, the one with three klingons who are rescued from a drifting derelict freighter (which was evidently armed with said rockets).
Quote from: FPF-Jem on July 31, 2004, 03:23:55 amOK, I'll post his here, I posted something similar in another thread but it probably wasn't read.I'm not a SFB player, and could care less about SFB. I do however vastly prefer OP over 3. I have tried 3 but I just can't get the same enthusiasm for it as I can for any of the older titles. It's not a matter of ship models or race, its just a matter of content, OP has much more for me than 3 and it doesn't have that infernal AV(I'm totally in agreement with Cleaven on that point, AV gives me a sour taste). I didn't buy those games for a Trek game, I bought them looking for a Space ship Battle simulator.As far a shunning of 3 goes, I don't think its anything more than the fact that most of those still in the OP section have tried it and just don't care much for it to switch, and to be blunt as some have pointed out, some in the 3 crowd don't seem to like us (or rather the game we like, OP) much either and aren't shy of making it known, which to be fair has probably affected my view of 3. What would be involved in drawing both communities together anyway? I am curious what this means to both you WT and Nanner, what would you like to see thats different now as far as the games go? Other than sharing mod/server-setup ideas perhaps I can't think of anything that would change?P.S. The BCG doesn't have plasma, the BCF does and rockets are a Cannon weapon in Star Trek, there just aparently obselete by TNG and theres no evidence of them being emplaced on Fed vessels, (though I don't think there's much evidence saying they weren't either ). However I fail to see how this is relevant in the current discussion anyway.I have never seen or read about missles being used in Star Trek niether TOS or TMP.I have read Star Trek novels.I already answered the F-BCG .
OK, I'll post his here, I posted something similar in another thread but it probably wasn't read.I'm not a SFB player, and could care less about SFB. I do however vastly prefer OP over 3. I have tried 3 but I just can't get the same enthusiasm for it as I can for any of the older titles. It's not a matter of ship models or race, its just a matter of content, OP has much more for me than 3 and it doesn't have that infernal AV(I'm totally in agreement with Cleaven on that point, AV gives me a sour taste). I didn't buy those games for a Trek game, I bought them looking for a Space ship Battle simulator.As far a shunning of 3 goes, I don't think its anything more than the fact that most of those still in the OP section have tried it and just don't care much for it to switch, and to be blunt as some have pointed out, some in the 3 crowd don't seem to like us (or rather the game we like, OP) much either and aren't shy of making it known, which to be fair has probably affected my view of 3. What would be involved in drawing both communities together anyway? I am curious what this means to both you WT and Nanner, what would you like to see thats different now as far as the games go? Other than sharing mod/server-setup ideas perhaps I can't think of anything that would change?P.S. The BCG doesn't have plasma, the BCF does and rockets are a Cannon weapon in Star Trek, there just aparently obselete by TNG and theres no evidence of them being emplaced on Fed vessels, (though I don't think there's much evidence saying they weren't either ). However I fail to see how this is relevant in the current discussion anyway.
You mean the BCF.
WaterTiger, the F-BCG doesn't have plasma on it. You've been told that several times, just shows you selectively read stuff addressed to you. You mean the BCF.As for where in Star Trek do Fed ships have plasma on them, no idea. I don't play this game for Star Trek, I play it for SFB. In fact, I'd be happier if SFB wasn't based on Star Trek at all, then we wouldn't have the "frkkn good duys" attitude and balance problems resulting from that.
Ok, now I'm confused, I agree, whether the BCF has plasma doesn't matter to the topic on hand. So what was the point of bringing it up?
BCG, BFG -- already edited.Call it the BFD!Where did the plasma come from?You sit here and make it a point back on page 2 somewhere, skirt the answer, talk poor Age into a circle (thanks Age for fixing that) ... and then refuse to get real!POINT IS NONE OF THIS MATTERS!!WE ARE A COMMUNITY OF PILOTS WHO PLAY THE TREK SERIES OF GAMES -- AND THE ATTITUDES FROM THE TYPICAL OP/EAW (not all, cuz Mog is one fo the few who doesn't generalize) PILOT FRANKLY SUCKS AS IT APPLIES TO SFC3.THIS IS A "COMMUNITY" BOARD!Gah!We don't even want you to fly SFC3. FBF is right ... two mindsets. Something happened to that head of yours Cleavan ...Go back to Nanner's original post. Read it again, and get back OTT.<S>
Topic: Community Gap - sfc2/3 a bridge that needs to be made (Read 31909 times)