I've played and supported both EaW, OP, and SFC3. Can you say the same? If yes, why stop? If no, why not?
I started on SFC3 and i won't play a predecessor. Why? Because it would be like playing GTA Vice City then going back to GTA London, you just don't do things like that. Sequals are improvements otherwise it wouldn't be a sequal. Again if the admins here are fed up with this conversation, my boards are open http://s4.invisionfree.com/waffle/index.php?
It's this type of hyperbole that continues to drive the mythical wedge WaterTiger, WildCard and others continually hype on. I am unsure of the reasoning of this continued mis-information but I am quite frankly sick of it. So, prepare yourself for the truth.
EAW / OP is a different FLAVOR of the SFC Series, but to say that sequels are improvments and apply that to SFC3 out of the box, heck even patched right now in a comparative nature to EAW / OP is patently ridiculous. While EAW / OP had it's bearload of bugs upon first release, SFC3 unfortunately suffered from Activisions lack of caring for the SFC Community audience in addition to an accelerated development schedule. That SFC3 is an "improvement" is a misnomer, and misleading. It's a different
style of game.
... and we all know who "we" is, really.
It's no secret that this board is heavily OP oriented and the EAW/OP personnel would rather SFC3 and its players dropped off the face of the Earth.
When the so-called Taldrenites talk of "community" ... the SFC3 crowd has and always will be the red-headed stepchild of the Taldren series of games. The "community" shunned the player base, the so-called "Nannerites" and other SFC3 players long ago.
<S>
AdmWaterTiger-11thFleet-
WaterTiger once again you are spewing more mis-information while avoiding the simplest of answers. You post insulting comments about myself on other websites and forums, including that I never answer a question but respond with insults. Mayhaps you are projecting your own actions, I do not know no care to venture a quess at this point. What I do know is that the only reason ANYONE may have this perception is largly due to your continued reciting of it over.. and over...and over.
IT IS NOT TRUE. WaterTiger is speaking words which are purposefully designed to convey the impression of negativety and pull support from D.net?
Why is this, WaterTiger? Direct question, no spinning, can you answer that directly?
Not only is his statement ridiculous, in fact, you'll see today just how untrue it is. You're also going to see in the future some pretty awesome things for Starfleet Command 3 coming out of D.Net. Mark those words, and let us prove them with actions, not flames, accusations and more community dividing rhetoric. From this point forward, if you speak or post something that is not true or mis-information, your post will be edited to reflect such. You are no longer going to have free-reign to publically promote your personal viewpoints because we've received over 100 complaints regarding just that behavior. The community has spoken, and at this point we feel like it's necessary to protect ourselves from your misinformation as we've asked you - heck I've asked you - nicely to stop with these innuendoes and comments that are NOT TRUE.
I find it very interesting that from page 1 to page 5 it's all about lawsuits, lawyers reined in, then suddenly when the truth of the legalities is revealed now it's "well it wasn't about the law...It's about (insult insult here) fleet ". Then what was the point of bringing all that up unless you were either :
A. Baiting
B. Lying about the whole deal just to bring more controvery to your life.
I can see where DieHard's comments can be echoed by many other of the silent majorities that frequent our site. It unfortunate that many in the SFC3 Community have presented just such a profile to the existing community members. The thing that people seem to find most insulting? That many in the SFC3 community have no respect - as displayed here by WaterTiger and several others - of the ongoing history we've had here in the SFC Community. While many individuals may state they've been around for years and years and years, they consistantly display no respect for the established groups, Fleets and mini-communities that were here long before SFC3 was a gleam in David Ferrells eye. WaterTiger says that SFC3 is the red-headed stepchild of the SFC Community - but it's only because you out there that love SFC3 so much believe that which makes it "true" for you.
Until many of the key people in the SFC3 communty stop listening to the purposeful mis-information campaign that some individuals continue to propogate then yes, perhaps we won't be able to offer as much support as we can. But in all instances people really just don't get it. Dynaverse.Net
is the officially sanctioned site by Taldren. We're the ones that have the approval of Taldren, and hence you'd think with the current state of affairs regarding SFC3's patching and functionality that everyone would be working with us to further the community's enjoyment of the SFC3 itself.Unfortunately, it takes a "team player" mentality to work together with others. It also takes a some common interests and beliefs for people to effectively work together - and I think that in itself is the main difference in the different "camps" of SFC players. I believe the majority of SFC3 players just want to see their game and community continue - without the politics and jockying. Without the insults and innuendo. Without all the extraneous crap. If you want that, then come to D.Net and contribute to the continuation of this great community.
If you want more of what's listed in this thread, keep listening to WaterTiger and all the rest that participated in the negativety of this thread. At least - for all intents and purposes - Sandman and his copatriats did show that they do have certain morals, ethics and standards in my personal opinion. That is appreciated.
Regards,