Topic: Nirendra III  (Read 2935 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Nirendra III
« on: June 10, 2004, 09:56:24 pm »
I made this in honor of WZ's awesome Melak.  Its Sweet!  

   

DonKarnage

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2004, 10:09:18 pm »
cool, the battle if kitamar when the enteprise C as defended a klingon colonie from the romulan.

KtHyla

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2004, 10:42:03 pm »
I think Garrett's in over her head this time...

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2004, 11:14:27 pm »
Weren't there four warbirds at Narendra III?

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2004, 11:21:18 pm »
There could have been, I dont remember if Garrat said how many warbirds.  She probably did, and I just dont remember.

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2004, 11:30:02 pm »
It was 4, at least in all the retellings I've heard of the story.  But the Melak-type is a perfect fit for that era.

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2004, 11:39:48 pm »
Was there ever a Lost Series novel based on it at all?  I Dont think i've ever seen one.  Paramount should try and explain some of this.  I figure though, that the Enterprise wasnt destroyed, but captured.  Because there were prisioners and such.  But also, it explains why the Ambassador is no longer in production.  The Romulans may have learned too much and so Starfleet stopped making it.  Easier than upgrading.

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2004, 11:47:31 pm »
Garrett simply said that there were four warbirds.  Whether or not there were survivors is up in the air and depends on if you believe Sela's story or not.

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2004, 12:02:54 am »
Well, they never showed her in DS9 or Nemesis, so really, there is no way to know if her story is true or not.

Kaenyne

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2004, 08:57:47 am »
Take a look below the middle Warbird. That's where the fourth one USED to be...
It's a GREAT pic, BTW.

starwolf3500

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2004, 09:20:33 am »
Quote:

Take a look below the middle Warbird. That's where the fourth one USED to be...
It's a GREAT pic, BTW.  




Uuh, not to be an ass but thats a klink base burning.

   

Kaenyne

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2004, 09:38:31 am »
Oh, I see that now. No problem correcting me.   Warbird number 4 must be cloaked.  

DestinyCalling

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #12 on: June 11, 2004, 09:43:27 am »
Nah... You're all wrong... The image is a external sensor relay from the fourth warbird......

oooh, sneaky Romulans....

   

Klingon Fanatic

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #13 on: June 11, 2004, 04:37:35 pm »
Quote:

Nah... You're all wrong... The image is a external sensor relay from the fourth warbird......

oooh, sneaky Romulans....

   




You are correct the 4th warbird was behind the Enterprise C!

As for survivors.... IIRC emember the TNG episode about Worf finding Romulans and Klingons living together in that colony. Remember the explaination for where Romulan Admiral Sela came from? That she is supposed to be Tasha Yar's daughter and that the Enterprise C hull is really somewhere on Romulus...

Nice render.

I've been in an alternate universe mode and in Centauri Vaughn's OP SCRIPT where the Ambassador is the Lexington class by WZ45 and the Klingon Base is the three-armed version from Klingon Academy. Naturally, I've kept WZ45's Melak in that mix, mwah ha ha!

Qapla!

KF
« Last Edit: June 11, 2004, 04:39:24 pm by Klingon Fanatic »

ModelsPlease

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2004, 01:21:48 am »
Of course the 4th Melak is behind the Enterprise C . Who the heck do ya think took that picture ?????  
-MP  

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #15 on: June 12, 2004, 01:51:28 am »
Ohhh thats great, i love it, i really wish sometimes they would of made a series on either the excelsior or ent c, it would of been exciting to see

adam out

ModelsPlease

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #16 on: June 12, 2004, 02:16:21 am »
I vote for an Excelsior show. Get George Takei to revise his Captain Sulu role.I'm sure Christian Slater could be talked into revising his role ( when was his last film right?),perhaps he is Sulu's number one? Man that would be cool.Wasn't Tuvok on that ship as well ?  Think of the cameo appearance opportunities. Chekov,Ohura,Scotty,Spock and dare I dream Kirk......    

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: Nirendra III
« Reply #17 on: June 12, 2004, 02:50:20 am »
Well i dont think theyll be up to it, 7 years thats alot of time, but i wouldnt mine seeing his daughter as captain or something, a new crew would be nice, anything besides enterprise, archer is quantum leaping more than he was back then

adam out

KtHyla

  • Guest
What I'd like to see in a new series?
« Reply #18 on: June 12, 2004, 12:16:59 pm »
It's my not-so-secret wish that the next Star Trek endeavour will, first and formeost, be a well writen story. As well well writen and well cast characters will be developed to make said story all the more deep and believeable. Then, and only then should any consideration should be given to what the ship looks like.

Babylon 5 took place in an unremarkable 5-mile tube, but people watched it for the characters and story. Firefly takes place in one of the ugliest ships in Sci-Fi, but people watch it for the characters and story. SG-1 doesn't even have a ship, so people definitely watch that for the characters and story.

And I'm still confounded as to why Star Trek hasn't taken this approach for nearly a decade. Trek seems to only be watched for the space battles now, and occasionally the cat-suited chicks. Nothing wrong with having a cool ship, a space-furball of hot lookin' girl in 'em, but Trek relies on superficial elements far too much nowadays. Of which is why Voyager and Enterprise really turned me off, nothing new, despite both situations being ripe for something fresh...

[/Rant]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by KtHyla »

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Re: What I'd like to see in a new series?
« Reply #19 on: June 12, 2004, 01:06:53 pm »
I'd have to agree on this one, and I actually think some more people would agree.  Space battles are always cool, but if you think about it, the last Trek movie to be praised was First Contact, and the only space battle was at the beginning for a short time, the rest was inside the ship.  As for Nemesis, the space battles were the best I have ever seen, but it lacked other things.

As for a show based on the Enterprise-C, think about the ending.  The final battle at Nirendra III.  The entire 7 years would have Captain Garret, but then in a flash the other guy is Captain, because Garret was killed by a Klingon attack in our space.  Unless the first hour of the show finale is a remake of "Yesterdays Enterprise" and the last hour is when they return to die in battle.

I think I read somewhere that before Enterprise, Sulu actually proposed a show to Paramount about the Excelsior, but they turned it down.  I met Sulu two weeks ago at a Sci-fi convention in Novi Michigan, he seemed capable of doing another show.  But i'm sure Paramount is kicking themselves for choosing Enterprise instead.