Here's the background:
In early April my brother was pulled over for a bad headlight, and after being ticketed for this the officer pulling him over discovered my brother's insurance had expired. For this, he was also ticketed. Severakl days later my brother had already paid his ticket, and renewed his insurance when he received a letter informing him his license had been revoked for the incident. My brother took this in stride, made his way down to city hall as soon as possible- relying on rides to work and everywhere else in the meantime and asked how to correct this issue. All he was told was that he must retake the driver's exam. he did so, and after passing asked when he could drive again. The city officials told him immediately. This was april 12. A few days alter he was pulled over because an officer saw some smoke puff out when a drop of oil dripped onto the manifold of my brother's car and burned. He was ticketed again for this, and also informed that his license was revoked, and was ticketed once more for driving with a revoked license this time. Frustrated, he called me up to take him home, and once again erlied on rides to and fro until he once again made it to city hall to clear up the issue. He was then told that he had not completed the proceedure for renewing his license, and once again, he took it in stride and did as he was told. All was quiet until today, when he had his court date. In court, he was informed by the judge that since he had been driving without a license the issue was not an issue, he was simply in violation of the law. A deal was cut, without my brothers foreknowledge that if he [pled guilty, they would reduce the newest fine (amongst several) at $220. Since he was pulled over in mid april, and a mandatory evaluation of his driver's test that my brother was never told about occurred on May 16- more than 1 month after he took the test, he was considered to be in violation of the law. Period. If he plead not guilty, jailtime and $1000. Obviously, he plead not guilty. no quarter was even considered for the fact that my brother was told that he had a valid license to drive. This last part, I'm a little sketchy on: at some point this morning, one of the ladies- not sure if it was the judge, or an associate of the judge- after my brother told her about the incident and how he had been told NUMEROUS times by city officials he was cleared to drive she told my brother, "that's too bad, sometimes they tell people they can drive before they can; I wish they wouldn't do that." Translation: we know this happens and why it happens, and we will not accept any responsibility for it because we don't have to.
I'm sorry if this next part comes off as short, but I want to be clear on this next part:
my brother feesl this incident is over and is so irritated by it that he is completely unwilling to fight this matter any further. While I value any advice the community has, I'd prefer not to hear it right now, because there is nothing that will be done at this point. Any attempt I make to even talk about this any further with him will result in a fight, so any discussion of how to handle this particular matter further is academic, and I'd rather not get good suggestions only to toss them by the wayside because they will never be entertained by the one person who needs them.
The reason I put this here is to ask this question: Where is the justice in this? If you reply about Rules, laws and regulations as though they're the word of God, I will get very irritated. My question is in regards to Ethics and Justice, not legality.
CK
P.S. I like Latinas...
....And apparently Asian ladies as well...