Topic: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy  (Read 11448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Khalee

  • Guest
Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« on: May 20, 2004, 02:21:29 am »
Well wouldnt it.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4980465/ and here I thought the last movie was allready out.  

CFA_Admiral_Tige

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2004, 06:48:57 am »
That is BS....you cant fire the creator from his creation

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2004, 09:34:06 am »
Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.

DreadlordGW

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2004, 10:05:00 am »
Quote:

Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.  




Part of the fun WAS the bad acting.

TalonClaw

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2004, 12:22:05 pm »
Quote:

Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.  




I didn't think TPM had a bad story line at all.  It clearly showed the beginings of Sidious manipulating the Republic to his eventual control.  The only thing bad about AOTC was the bad acting but at least that was entertaining.

Although goofy, I actually thought Jar Jar was entertaining and funny in TPM.  Way better than a bunch of teddie bears attacking storm troopers in episode 6.

I think the final movie of the first trilogy is going to be a blast and I can't wait.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2004, 01:13:10 pm »
Well, I might have used the wrong words.

TPM was actually pretty good (in my opinion), but at some points got boring, which was frustrating.  It didn't have as much action as it should have, with the exception of a sudden (completely unexpected) and short lightsaber duel in the middle, and the normal "big ending battle".  Oh, and a race in the middle.  The actors at least weren't that bad, though Jar-Jar was a nightmare.

AOTC though...good action (not too much, but enough that it keeps you watching), good storyline.  The Anakin-Padme love scenes looked choreographed, though, lol.

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2004, 01:19:36 pm »
The dialogue in AOTC was horrid and the "romance" between Padme and Annakin looked painfully contrived.  I know Natalie Portman is a very good actress and Hayden Christiansen is no slouch....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?


 

Sirgod

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2004, 01:32:36 pm »
Quote:

The dialogue in AOTC was horrid and the "romance" between Padme and Annakin looked painfully contrived.  I know Natalie Portman is a very good actress and Hayden Christiansen is no slouch....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?


 




Her acting in The Professional was more Believable then In either of the SW movies IMHO.

stephen

Corbomite

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2004, 02:04:27 pm »
Quote:

....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?





Why the director of course, but you can't tell King George that I'm sure.  

To be fair, I thoguht Natalie did fairly well with some horrid lines. It sounded like a highschool play to me in parts.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2004, 03:37:36 pm »
Lucas can turn Sam Jackson into a bad actor.   That takes skill.

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2004, 05:33:34 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?





Why the director of course, but you can't tell King George that I'm sure.  

To be fair, I thoguht Natalie did fairly well with some horrid lines. It sounded like a highschool play to me in parts.  





It almost seemed like Natalie cringed while saying some of her dialogue.  I think she did a fine job in both the latest SW flicks, it's just that she didn't have much to work with.  I agree with you...it did sound very high-school play-ish.  Ugh...


TPM wasn't as bad as AOTC in this particular department.  The way they portrayed the Gungans was a bit annoying and Jar-Jar was the biggest thing I wish wasn't in the movie, but other than that, I enjoyed it.  Paid to see it 9 times.  Only paid to see AOTC twice (once in theaters and once when I bought the DVD).

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2004, 05:33:55 pm »
Quote:

Lucas can turn Sam Jackson into a bad actor.   That takes skill.  




Word.

TalonClaw

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2004, 11:48:00 am »
Quote:

Well, I might have used the wrong words.

TPM was actually pretty good (in my opinion), but at some points got boring, which was frustrating.  It didn't have as much action as it should have, with the exception of a sudden (completely unexpected) and short lightsaber duel in the middle, and the normal "big ending battle".  Oh, and a race in the middle.  The actors at least weren't that bad, though Jar-Jar was a nightmare.

AOTC though...good action (not too much, but enough that it keeps you watching), good storyline.  The Anakin-Padme love scenes looked choreographed, though, lol.  




The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2004, 12:11:48 pm »
The lightsaber duels were the ONLY redeeming features in the two movies, IMHO- either the acting is really bad, or my suspension of disbelief is truely begining to suffer from those two most terrible diseases... age and maturity. For some reason, Han Solo was a more believeable character than that cat they have playing Anikin is in REAL LIFE. I've met lots of free-wheeling scoundrels... I've never met a walking maniquin.

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by J. Carney »

762

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2004, 12:13:49 pm »
Quote:

The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.  




The Darth Maul duel (especially the finale with Obi-Wan) was awesome. The Dooku duel was lame - I guess he was supposed to be too good for either Anakin or Obi-Wan to compete with. The Yoda bit was just silly, and the horrible writing only made it worse.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2004, 12:34:35 pm »
One thing's for sure, Ep3 is gonna have some awesome battles.

What will we have?

Anakin vs Obi-wan
Someone vs General Grevious
Someone vs Dooku

Someone is going to kill Mace Windu at some point, and most of the Jedi are going to die.  There will be a big opening battle, and the final battle of the clone wars, and the takeover of Emperor Palpatine.

Whoo!

BTW you guys really should watch the Clone Wars cartoons.  Grevious is AWESOME.

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2004, 12:34:59 pm »
remember in that millue fights are different because the force augments thier endurance, strength, agility, reactions, even allowing precognition, annd abeyance of phisics and physiology to a degree. Thier fights do not have to follow the normal course of a mundane sword duel. If it did it would be pretty boring.

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2004, 12:40:04 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.  




The Darth Maul duel (especially the finale with Obi-Wan) was awesome. The Dooku duel was lame - I guess he was supposed to be too good for either Anakin or Obi-Wan to compete with. The Yoda bit was just silly, and the horrible writing only made it worse.  




And the most ironic thing...

The duel in the Original Star Wars was FAR more accurate of what sword fighting (at least from what I've learned in fencing these past few years) really is like...heck, Empire Strikes Back is more accurate (Wide strikes, and a few circles, but most of the moves don't have a 3/4 circular movement to them, which unless used for power, is suicide typically, and a lot of Obi Wan's moves would weren't for power...but were suicidal...Darth Maul had some moves, but moved better, and should have taken them both out in a matter of seconds looking at stance, movement, and sword attacks/defends).

It's amazing that Obi Wan, or one of the others in the TPM movie wasn't cut in half in their first circle swing when all the other bad guy had to do was extend their arm and cut them in half, or stab them through!

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2004, 12:44:05 pm »
Don't forget the force.

A Jedi can read the mind of an opponent, and know where he is going to strike before he actually strikes.  That is why the Jedi can lightsaber duel for such a long time- they know where every strike is going to hit, and thus, can block every strike, until they tire and slip up once, and in that moment they get stabbed through the chest.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2004, 12:51:03 pm »
I do think the Jedi can be quite silly at times.

If I were Obi-wan or Qui-gon, when they were on the TradeFed ship at the start of TPM and the 3 shielded Droidekas attacked, I would have destroyed them.

How, you ask?  When they have shields and were firing so rapidly?

Force push.  Bam, they're all down.  Shields can't stop the Force, you know.  Just reach out with the force, find their computer core, and rip it out of it's sockets.

Fighting people?  Use the force to smash their brain flat.

Fighting an army with AT-AT's?  AT-ST's?  Use the Force to knock them over, then use the force to send the downed vehicles sliding into the armies around them.

Fighting a spaceship?  Mind trick the bridge crew to activate self destruct.  Or if the self destruct sequence is complicated, mind trick them to drop the shields to their docking bay (make them think fighters are exiting), then fire torpedoes inside.

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #20 on: May 21, 2004, 12:54:16 pm »
Or like the vulcans did thier most powerful TKs destroyed the welds in an enemies hull plating while it orbited thier planet.

Sethan

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #21 on: May 21, 2004, 01:20:06 pm »
Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #22 on: May 21, 2004, 01:43:59 pm »
Watched a lot of colligate matches when i was at University of Alabama (friend who took basic classes took me). Some went 5 mins or so. Most were over in 2 or 3. Plenty went in a lot less.

20 minutes... they probably had to drag those folks off the mat. They had to be exhausted.

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #23 on: May 21, 2004, 01:52:16 pm »
 If a Jedi used the Force to smash sombodys brain flat, They would be Sith not Jedi......  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #24 on: May 21, 2004, 02:06:44 pm »
My WEG Starwars force user character played telekinetic people tennis all the time.  

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #25 on: May 21, 2004, 02:14:11 pm »
 I guess he was a Sedi ?  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #26 on: May 21, 2004, 02:32:17 pm »
Well the rule books allowed for non sith force users that did not subscribe fully to the jedi code. An example is the witches of Endor (I think.) so we created a "grey order" who were not fully white nore wholy black. This predates ATOC by nearly a decade but it bears out becasue mace windu uses rage to channel his fighting power as an accepted if feared  jedi technique.  

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #27 on: May 21, 2004, 03:20:26 pm »
I have too much love in my heart for Star Wars to truely dislike any of it's movies. Though, I'm sad to say, George Lucas does appear to have his limits. He needs to rediscover whatever gave the magic to the original  trilogy (assuming he had anything to do with it at all. I can't say for sure.)

I have to agree with Praxis and say that the Star Wars microseries by Genndy Tartakovsky (creator of the amazing Samurai Jack) is awesome.  The action in it is stupendous. I can't wait for it to come out on DVD.
 

Elvis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #28 on: May 21, 2004, 09:55:45 pm »
The problem is we are fans and I probably wouldn't go to far out on a limb to say that we grew up with the original trilogy and I think that somewhat clouds our vision. George Lucas had the chance to deliver another trilogy that would "shock and awe" us. He hasn't delivered, he hasn't even come close to meeting expectations; and  the new trilogy lacks any kind of impact. How many lines can you remeber from the first three films? Things like "Use the force Luke.", "May the force be with you." or "I am your father" all show an indication of some kind of influence those movies had on us. What comes from the second trilogy? The new trilogy also really lacks anything really inspirational that effects us. I really don't feel anything toward the characters, except for maybe pity. Are the characters really memorable or the battles all that climatic. No, not really, I loved the first Star Wars, saw it like 15 times during its run at the original Cine Capri in Phoenix, but the second series just lacks. As a final note as with LOTR I think the Academy is just waiting to give the last installment the notice the series deserves.  

 

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #29 on: May 21, 2004, 10:08:02 pm »
In a similar vein, he is also releasing a special edition of his first film THX 1138 in the fall, complete with computer-generated images and edits.  Here's the trailer (Quicktime and a bit of bandwith required).

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #30 on: May 21, 2004, 10:36:52 pm »
 How many lines can you remeber from the first three films? Things like "Use the force Luke.", "May the force be with you." or "I am your father"  




"Scoundrel, scoundrel... I like the sound of that."

Or one even better:

"No reward is worth this!"

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #31 on: May 21, 2004, 11:37:03 pm »
 Ah yes i for got about Vapad, Mace Windu is a force to be reckoned with. I wonder how he is going to be killed?  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #32 on: May 21, 2004, 11:41:15 pm »
I would say either taken by stealth or while distracted, killed by something like a deadfall or explosion or betrayal by a trusted friend.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2004, 11:41:55 pm by Stormbringer »

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #33 on: May 21, 2004, 11:51:21 pm »
 It would have to be some thing like that. From what im reading you cant even see him move when he gets going, He is so fast.  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #34 on: May 21, 2004, 11:56:26 pm »
It is possible that a force deadening mechanism or creature could be used. Like the ysilamiri from the thrawn series.

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #35 on: May 22, 2004, 12:52:54 am »
I hope not. I don't know if I can take another midichlorian like debacle.

Also. People, if your going to post spoilers then post spoiler warnings.  
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Tremok »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #36 on: May 22, 2004, 12:59:22 am »
But I'm not because far as I know no one has seen the movie or a script. This was just speculation. We know or think he dies because of what was in the first trilogy about the jedi purge with just three or four jedi or sith apparently surviving. yoda, ben, darth, the emperor. Novels (questionable as to whether they were cannon or not) had a few others.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2004, 01:01:01 am by Stormbringer »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #37 on: May 22, 2004, 01:12:17 am »
Yep the midicalorians sucked some of the life out of the mythos. The ysilamiri did not at least not to an appreciable degree. And with force crystals used to make sabers that interact with the force it would be logical that a dampening field could be engineered. The technology could be lost with the jedi purge and holocrons.

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2004, 01:52:08 am »
Praxis did not seem to post his information in tones of speculation to me. I assumed he got his data form the Star Wars insider thing or from a website or person who has it.  Regardless, I just ask that we be careful.... I cannot count how many times my supsense was damaged to some degree by persons who posted spoilers without spoiler warnings. It has become somewhat of a pet peeve of mine.

This page helps me deal with midicalorians. Lucas kept it all vague enough that I could tolerate it, though I still don't like it. I have a bigger problem with force machines/dampeners. They just don't sit well with me. That machines or animals could deny or manipulate the force, it's will, it's influence... I just don't like it.

As for lightsabers... I always thought they were ordinary devices that only a Jedi could effectively wield.  
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Tremok »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #39 on: May 22, 2004, 09:36:23 am »
A jedi can only build a saber upon reaching a certain level of attainment with the force and is not considered a jedi unti he or she does so. The crystals used are force sensitive. This is all just semi-cannon from novels and from WEG which is a primary research source for nearly all the novel writers.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Stormbringer »

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #40 on: May 22, 2004, 10:41:43 am »
Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.

Corbomite

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #41 on: May 22, 2004, 10:45:34 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.  




I heard that Yoda does all his own stunt work.

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #42 on: May 23, 2004, 01:38:18 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.  




As I said...Fencing is real fighting (some will say that it's merely a touch, and to some degree that is true...however, it's where it touches...and in practice, when really doing this...it probably WILL leave bruises...so it has some strength to it...we're taught to stab through the object, even if with a blunt edge it will not.  Still, believe it or not, there are some that actually practice with real blades...rather dangerous and usually quite bloody if you ask me, where you hit in fencing typically is targetting for what could be considered the vitals for the type of weapon you are holding overall)...much of SCA is just people who have NO clue as too what they are doing...playing around...course 90% of the people in the Middle ages had less training when in battle Soooo...

I suppose it is rather realistic to that extent...and those more experienced of course WILL do better, and the artform of Western Battle arts does have SOME merit...of course that only applies to those in Europe I would imagine...

On the otherhand, I'd put a world class fencer against the SCA's best anyday...and in a fair fight...I'd bet on the fencer...100% of the time.

Problem with the starwars battles...their so obviously stage fighting...that it's obvious that a Jedi would be killed in less than a minute by someone who REALLY knew how to wield a weapon.

Perhaps that's why the battles are so short...the Jedi AND the Sith aren't really all that skilled (except when a sith fights a computer animated green elf fairie that looks so hilarious...I think most fencers would either fall down laughing and be killed, OR take a few steps into an empty area devoid of objects for the green jumper to jump off of) so obviously their battles can't be that long...

 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Dash Jones »

Khalee

  • Guest
Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #43 on: May 20, 2004, 02:21:29 am »
Well wouldnt it.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4980465/ and here I thought the last movie was allready out.  

CFA_Admiral_Tige

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #44 on: May 20, 2004, 06:48:57 am »
That is BS....you cant fire the creator from his creation

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #45 on: May 20, 2004, 09:34:06 am »
Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.

DreadlordGW

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #46 on: May 20, 2004, 10:05:00 am »
Quote:

Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.  




Part of the fun WAS the bad acting.

TalonClaw

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #47 on: May 20, 2004, 12:22:05 pm »
Quote:

Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.  




I didn't think TPM had a bad story line at all.  It clearly showed the beginings of Sidious manipulating the Republic to his eventual control.  The only thing bad about AOTC was the bad acting but at least that was entertaining.

Although goofy, I actually thought Jar Jar was entertaining and funny in TPM.  Way better than a bunch of teddie bears attacking storm troopers in episode 6.

I think the final movie of the first trilogy is going to be a blast and I can't wait.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #48 on: May 20, 2004, 01:13:10 pm »
Well, I might have used the wrong words.

TPM was actually pretty good (in my opinion), but at some points got boring, which was frustrating.  It didn't have as much action as it should have, with the exception of a sudden (completely unexpected) and short lightsaber duel in the middle, and the normal "big ending battle".  Oh, and a race in the middle.  The actors at least weren't that bad, though Jar-Jar was a nightmare.

AOTC though...good action (not too much, but enough that it keeps you watching), good storyline.  The Anakin-Padme love scenes looked choreographed, though, lol.

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #49 on: May 20, 2004, 01:19:36 pm »
The dialogue in AOTC was horrid and the "romance" between Padme and Annakin looked painfully contrived.  I know Natalie Portman is a very good actress and Hayden Christiansen is no slouch....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?


 

Sirgod

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #50 on: May 20, 2004, 01:32:36 pm »
Quote:

The dialogue in AOTC was horrid and the "romance" between Padme and Annakin looked painfully contrived.  I know Natalie Portman is a very good actress and Hayden Christiansen is no slouch....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?


 




Her acting in The Professional was more Believable then In either of the SW movies IMHO.

stephen

Corbomite

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #51 on: May 20, 2004, 02:04:27 pm »
Quote:

....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?





Why the director of course, but you can't tell King George that I'm sure.  

To be fair, I thoguht Natalie did fairly well with some horrid lines. It sounded like a highschool play to me in parts.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #52 on: May 20, 2004, 03:37:36 pm »
Lucas can turn Sam Jackson into a bad actor.   That takes skill.

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #53 on: May 20, 2004, 05:33:34 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?





Why the director of course, but you can't tell King George that I'm sure.  

To be fair, I thoguht Natalie did fairly well with some horrid lines. It sounded like a highschool play to me in parts.  





It almost seemed like Natalie cringed while saying some of her dialogue.  I think she did a fine job in both the latest SW flicks, it's just that she didn't have much to work with.  I agree with you...it did sound very high-school play-ish.  Ugh...


TPM wasn't as bad as AOTC in this particular department.  The way they portrayed the Gungans was a bit annoying and Jar-Jar was the biggest thing I wish wasn't in the movie, but other than that, I enjoyed it.  Paid to see it 9 times.  Only paid to see AOTC twice (once in theaters and once when I bought the DVD).

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #54 on: May 20, 2004, 05:33:55 pm »
Quote:

Lucas can turn Sam Jackson into a bad actor.   That takes skill.  




Word.

TalonClaw

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #55 on: May 21, 2004, 11:48:00 am »
Quote:

Well, I might have used the wrong words.

TPM was actually pretty good (in my opinion), but at some points got boring, which was frustrating.  It didn't have as much action as it should have, with the exception of a sudden (completely unexpected) and short lightsaber duel in the middle, and the normal "big ending battle".  Oh, and a race in the middle.  The actors at least weren't that bad, though Jar-Jar was a nightmare.

AOTC though...good action (not too much, but enough that it keeps you watching), good storyline.  The Anakin-Padme love scenes looked choreographed, though, lol.  




The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #56 on: May 21, 2004, 12:11:48 pm »
The lightsaber duels were the ONLY redeeming features in the two movies, IMHO- either the acting is really bad, or my suspension of disbelief is truely begining to suffer from those two most terrible diseases... age and maturity. For some reason, Han Solo was a more believeable character than that cat they have playing Anikin is in REAL LIFE. I've met lots of free-wheeling scoundrels... I've never met a walking maniquin.

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by J. Carney »

762

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #57 on: May 21, 2004, 12:13:49 pm »
Quote:

The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.  




The Darth Maul duel (especially the finale with Obi-Wan) was awesome. The Dooku duel was lame - I guess he was supposed to be too good for either Anakin or Obi-Wan to compete with. The Yoda bit was just silly, and the horrible writing only made it worse.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #58 on: May 21, 2004, 12:34:35 pm »
One thing's for sure, Ep3 is gonna have some awesome battles.

What will we have?

Anakin vs Obi-wan
Someone vs General Grevious
Someone vs Dooku

Someone is going to kill Mace Windu at some point, and most of the Jedi are going to die.  There will be a big opening battle, and the final battle of the clone wars, and the takeover of Emperor Palpatine.

Whoo!

BTW you guys really should watch the Clone Wars cartoons.  Grevious is AWESOME.

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #59 on: May 21, 2004, 12:34:59 pm »
remember in that millue fights are different because the force augments thier endurance, strength, agility, reactions, even allowing precognition, annd abeyance of phisics and physiology to a degree. Thier fights do not have to follow the normal course of a mundane sword duel. If it did it would be pretty boring.

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #60 on: May 21, 2004, 12:40:04 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.  




The Darth Maul duel (especially the finale with Obi-Wan) was awesome. The Dooku duel was lame - I guess he was supposed to be too good for either Anakin or Obi-Wan to compete with. The Yoda bit was just silly, and the horrible writing only made it worse.  




And the most ironic thing...

The duel in the Original Star Wars was FAR more accurate of what sword fighting (at least from what I've learned in fencing these past few years) really is like...heck, Empire Strikes Back is more accurate (Wide strikes, and a few circles, but most of the moves don't have a 3/4 circular movement to them, which unless used for power, is suicide typically, and a lot of Obi Wan's moves would weren't for power...but were suicidal...Darth Maul had some moves, but moved better, and should have taken them both out in a matter of seconds looking at stance, movement, and sword attacks/defends).

It's amazing that Obi Wan, or one of the others in the TPM movie wasn't cut in half in their first circle swing when all the other bad guy had to do was extend their arm and cut them in half, or stab them through!

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #61 on: May 21, 2004, 12:44:05 pm »
Don't forget the force.

A Jedi can read the mind of an opponent, and know where he is going to strike before he actually strikes.  That is why the Jedi can lightsaber duel for such a long time- they know where every strike is going to hit, and thus, can block every strike, until they tire and slip up once, and in that moment they get stabbed through the chest.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #62 on: May 21, 2004, 12:51:03 pm »
I do think the Jedi can be quite silly at times.

If I were Obi-wan or Qui-gon, when they were on the TradeFed ship at the start of TPM and the 3 shielded Droidekas attacked, I would have destroyed them.

How, you ask?  When they have shields and were firing so rapidly?

Force push.  Bam, they're all down.  Shields can't stop the Force, you know.  Just reach out with the force, find their computer core, and rip it out of it's sockets.

Fighting people?  Use the force to smash their brain flat.

Fighting an army with AT-AT's?  AT-ST's?  Use the Force to knock them over, then use the force to send the downed vehicles sliding into the armies around them.

Fighting a spaceship?  Mind trick the bridge crew to activate self destruct.  Or if the self destruct sequence is complicated, mind trick them to drop the shields to their docking bay (make them think fighters are exiting), then fire torpedoes inside.

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #63 on: May 21, 2004, 12:54:16 pm »
Or like the vulcans did thier most powerful TKs destroyed the welds in an enemies hull plating while it orbited thier planet.

Sethan

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #64 on: May 21, 2004, 01:20:06 pm »
Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #65 on: May 21, 2004, 01:43:59 pm »
Watched a lot of colligate matches when i was at University of Alabama (friend who took basic classes took me). Some went 5 mins or so. Most were over in 2 or 3. Plenty went in a lot less.

20 minutes... they probably had to drag those folks off the mat. They had to be exhausted.

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #66 on: May 21, 2004, 01:52:16 pm »
 If a Jedi used the Force to smash sombodys brain flat, They would be Sith not Jedi......  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #67 on: May 21, 2004, 02:06:44 pm »
My WEG Starwars force user character played telekinetic people tennis all the time.  

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #68 on: May 21, 2004, 02:14:11 pm »
 I guess he was a Sedi ?  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #69 on: May 21, 2004, 02:32:17 pm »
Well the rule books allowed for non sith force users that did not subscribe fully to the jedi code. An example is the witches of Endor (I think.) so we created a "grey order" who were not fully white nore wholy black. This predates ATOC by nearly a decade but it bears out becasue mace windu uses rage to channel his fighting power as an accepted if feared  jedi technique.  

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #70 on: May 21, 2004, 03:20:26 pm »
I have too much love in my heart for Star Wars to truely dislike any of it's movies. Though, I'm sad to say, George Lucas does appear to have his limits. He needs to rediscover whatever gave the magic to the original  trilogy (assuming he had anything to do with it at all. I can't say for sure.)

I have to agree with Praxis and say that the Star Wars microseries by Genndy Tartakovsky (creator of the amazing Samurai Jack) is awesome.  The action in it is stupendous. I can't wait for it to come out on DVD.
 

Elvis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #71 on: May 21, 2004, 09:55:45 pm »
The problem is we are fans and I probably wouldn't go to far out on a limb to say that we grew up with the original trilogy and I think that somewhat clouds our vision. George Lucas had the chance to deliver another trilogy that would "shock and awe" us. He hasn't delivered, he hasn't even come close to meeting expectations; and  the new trilogy lacks any kind of impact. How many lines can you remeber from the first three films? Things like "Use the force Luke.", "May the force be with you." or "I am your father" all show an indication of some kind of influence those movies had on us. What comes from the second trilogy? The new trilogy also really lacks anything really inspirational that effects us. I really don't feel anything toward the characters, except for maybe pity. Are the characters really memorable or the battles all that climatic. No, not really, I loved the first Star Wars, saw it like 15 times during its run at the original Cine Capri in Phoenix, but the second series just lacks. As a final note as with LOTR I think the Academy is just waiting to give the last installment the notice the series deserves.  

 

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #72 on: May 21, 2004, 10:08:02 pm »
In a similar vein, he is also releasing a special edition of his first film THX 1138 in the fall, complete with computer-generated images and edits.  Here's the trailer (Quicktime and a bit of bandwith required).

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #73 on: May 21, 2004, 10:36:52 pm »
 How many lines can you remeber from the first three films? Things like "Use the force Luke.", "May the force be with you." or "I am your father"  




"Scoundrel, scoundrel... I like the sound of that."

Or one even better:

"No reward is worth this!"

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #74 on: May 21, 2004, 11:37:03 pm »
 Ah yes i for got about Vapad, Mace Windu is a force to be reckoned with. I wonder how he is going to be killed?  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #75 on: May 21, 2004, 11:41:15 pm »
I would say either taken by stealth or while distracted, killed by something like a deadfall or explosion or betrayal by a trusted friend.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2004, 11:41:55 pm by Stormbringer »

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #76 on: May 21, 2004, 11:51:21 pm »
 It would have to be some thing like that. From what im reading you cant even see him move when he gets going, He is so fast.  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #77 on: May 21, 2004, 11:56:26 pm »
It is possible that a force deadening mechanism or creature could be used. Like the ysilamiri from the thrawn series.

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #78 on: May 22, 2004, 12:52:54 am »
I hope not. I don't know if I can take another midichlorian like debacle.

Also. People, if your going to post spoilers then post spoiler warnings.  
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Tremok »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #79 on: May 22, 2004, 12:59:22 am »
But I'm not because far as I know no one has seen the movie or a script. This was just speculation. We know or think he dies because of what was in the first trilogy about the jedi purge with just three or four jedi or sith apparently surviving. yoda, ben, darth, the emperor. Novels (questionable as to whether they were cannon or not) had a few others.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2004, 01:01:01 am by Stormbringer »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #80 on: May 22, 2004, 01:12:17 am »
Yep the midicalorians sucked some of the life out of the mythos. The ysilamiri did not at least not to an appreciable degree. And with force crystals used to make sabers that interact with the force it would be logical that a dampening field could be engineered. The technology could be lost with the jedi purge and holocrons.

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #81 on: May 22, 2004, 01:52:08 am »
Praxis did not seem to post his information in tones of speculation to me. I assumed he got his data form the Star Wars insider thing or from a website or person who has it.  Regardless, I just ask that we be careful.... I cannot count how many times my supsense was damaged to some degree by persons who posted spoilers without spoiler warnings. It has become somewhat of a pet peeve of mine.

This page helps me deal with midicalorians. Lucas kept it all vague enough that I could tolerate it, though I still don't like it. I have a bigger problem with force machines/dampeners. They just don't sit well with me. That machines or animals could deny or manipulate the force, it's will, it's influence... I just don't like it.

As for lightsabers... I always thought they were ordinary devices that only a Jedi could effectively wield.  
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Tremok »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #82 on: May 22, 2004, 09:36:23 am »
A jedi can only build a saber upon reaching a certain level of attainment with the force and is not considered a jedi unti he or she does so. The crystals used are force sensitive. This is all just semi-cannon from novels and from WEG which is a primary research source for nearly all the novel writers.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Stormbringer »

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #83 on: May 22, 2004, 10:41:43 am »
Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.

Corbomite

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #84 on: May 22, 2004, 10:45:34 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.  




I heard that Yoda does all his own stunt work.

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #85 on: May 23, 2004, 01:38:18 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.  




As I said...Fencing is real fighting (some will say that it's merely a touch, and to some degree that is true...however, it's where it touches...and in practice, when really doing this...it probably WILL leave bruises...so it has some strength to it...we're taught to stab through the object, even if with a blunt edge it will not.  Still, believe it or not, there are some that actually practice with real blades...rather dangerous and usually quite bloody if you ask me, where you hit in fencing typically is targetting for what could be considered the vitals for the type of weapon you are holding overall)...much of SCA is just people who have NO clue as too what they are doing...playing around...course 90% of the people in the Middle ages had less training when in battle Soooo...

I suppose it is rather realistic to that extent...and those more experienced of course WILL do better, and the artform of Western Battle arts does have SOME merit...of course that only applies to those in Europe I would imagine...

On the otherhand, I'd put a world class fencer against the SCA's best anyday...and in a fair fight...I'd bet on the fencer...100% of the time.

Problem with the starwars battles...their so obviously stage fighting...that it's obvious that a Jedi would be killed in less than a minute by someone who REALLY knew how to wield a weapon.

Perhaps that's why the battles are so short...the Jedi AND the Sith aren't really all that skilled (except when a sith fights a computer animated green elf fairie that looks so hilarious...I think most fencers would either fall down laughing and be killed, OR take a few steps into an empty area devoid of objects for the green jumper to jump off of) so obviously their battles can't be that long...

 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Dash Jones »

Khalee

  • Guest
Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #86 on: May 20, 2004, 02:21:29 am »
Well wouldnt it.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4980465/ and here I thought the last movie was allready out.  

CFA_Admiral_Tige

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #87 on: May 20, 2004, 06:48:57 am »
That is BS....you cant fire the creator from his creation

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #88 on: May 20, 2004, 09:34:06 am »
Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.

DreadlordGW

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #89 on: May 20, 2004, 10:05:00 am »
Quote:

Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.  




Part of the fun WAS the bad acting.

TalonClaw

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #90 on: May 20, 2004, 12:22:05 pm »
Quote:

Idiots.

Aren't these MSN people the same guy who had an article yesterday about how to "fire your boss"?

*sigh*

TPM might have had a bad storyline, but AOTC wasn't actually all that bad.  With the exception of bad acting on the part of Anakin and Padme.  




I didn't think TPM had a bad story line at all.  It clearly showed the beginings of Sidious manipulating the Republic to his eventual control.  The only thing bad about AOTC was the bad acting but at least that was entertaining.

Although goofy, I actually thought Jar Jar was entertaining and funny in TPM.  Way better than a bunch of teddie bears attacking storm troopers in episode 6.

I think the final movie of the first trilogy is going to be a blast and I can't wait.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #91 on: May 20, 2004, 01:13:10 pm »
Well, I might have used the wrong words.

TPM was actually pretty good (in my opinion), but at some points got boring, which was frustrating.  It didn't have as much action as it should have, with the exception of a sudden (completely unexpected) and short lightsaber duel in the middle, and the normal "big ending battle".  Oh, and a race in the middle.  The actors at least weren't that bad, though Jar-Jar was a nightmare.

AOTC though...good action (not too much, but enough that it keeps you watching), good storyline.  The Anakin-Padme love scenes looked choreographed, though, lol.

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #92 on: May 20, 2004, 01:19:36 pm »
The dialogue in AOTC was horrid and the "romance" between Padme and Annakin looked painfully contrived.  I know Natalie Portman is a very good actress and Hayden Christiansen is no slouch....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?


 

Sirgod

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #93 on: May 20, 2004, 01:32:36 pm »
Quote:

The dialogue in AOTC was horrid and the "romance" between Padme and Annakin looked painfully contrived.  I know Natalie Portman is a very good actress and Hayden Christiansen is no slouch....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?


 




Her acting in The Professional was more Believable then In either of the SW movies IMHO.

stephen

Corbomite

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #94 on: May 20, 2004, 02:04:27 pm »
Quote:

....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?





Why the director of course, but you can't tell King George that I'm sure.  

To be fair, I thoguht Natalie did fairly well with some horrid lines. It sounded like a highschool play to me in parts.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #95 on: May 20, 2004, 03:37:36 pm »
Lucas can turn Sam Jackson into a bad actor.   That takes skill.

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #96 on: May 20, 2004, 05:33:34 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

....so who is responsible for that increidbly horrid acting?





Why the director of course, but you can't tell King George that I'm sure.  

To be fair, I thoguht Natalie did fairly well with some horrid lines. It sounded like a highschool play to me in parts.  





It almost seemed like Natalie cringed while saying some of her dialogue.  I think she did a fine job in both the latest SW flicks, it's just that she didn't have much to work with.  I agree with you...it did sound very high-school play-ish.  Ugh...


TPM wasn't as bad as AOTC in this particular department.  The way they portrayed the Gungans was a bit annoying and Jar-Jar was the biggest thing I wish wasn't in the movie, but other than that, I enjoyed it.  Paid to see it 9 times.  Only paid to see AOTC twice (once in theaters and once when I bought the DVD).

Dogmatix!

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #97 on: May 20, 2004, 05:33:55 pm »
Quote:

Lucas can turn Sam Jackson into a bad actor.   That takes skill.  




Word.

TalonClaw

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #98 on: May 21, 2004, 11:48:00 am »
Quote:

Well, I might have used the wrong words.

TPM was actually pretty good (in my opinion), but at some points got boring, which was frustrating.  It didn't have as much action as it should have, with the exception of a sudden (completely unexpected) and short lightsaber duel in the middle, and the normal "big ending battle".  Oh, and a race in the middle.  The actors at least weren't that bad, though Jar-Jar was a nightmare.

AOTC though...good action (not too much, but enough that it keeps you watching), good storyline.  The Anakin-Padme love scenes looked choreographed, though, lol.  




The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #99 on: May 21, 2004, 12:11:48 pm »
The lightsaber duels were the ONLY redeeming features in the two movies, IMHO- either the acting is really bad, or my suspension of disbelief is truely begining to suffer from those two most terrible diseases... age and maturity. For some reason, Han Solo was a more believeable character than that cat they have playing Anikin is in REAL LIFE. I've met lots of free-wheeling scoundrels... I've never met a walking maniquin.

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by J. Carney »

762

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #100 on: May 21, 2004, 12:13:49 pm »
Quote:

The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.  




The Darth Maul duel (especially the finale with Obi-Wan) was awesome. The Dooku duel was lame - I guess he was supposed to be too good for either Anakin or Obi-Wan to compete with. The Yoda bit was just silly, and the horrible writing only made it worse.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #101 on: May 21, 2004, 12:34:35 pm »
One thing's for sure, Ep3 is gonna have some awesome battles.

What will we have?

Anakin vs Obi-wan
Someone vs General Grevious
Someone vs Dooku

Someone is going to kill Mace Windu at some point, and most of the Jedi are going to die.  There will be a big opening battle, and the final battle of the clone wars, and the takeover of Emperor Palpatine.

Whoo!

BTW you guys really should watch the Clone Wars cartoons.  Grevious is AWESOME.

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #102 on: May 21, 2004, 12:34:59 pm »
remember in that millue fights are different because the force augments thier endurance, strength, agility, reactions, even allowing precognition, annd abeyance of phisics and physiology to a degree. Thier fights do not have to follow the normal course of a mundane sword duel. If it did it would be pretty boring.

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #103 on: May 21, 2004, 12:40:04 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

The one thing I thought was lacking in both movies was dramatic light saber duels.  They were over way too quick.   The one cool thing in the final movie is that it will be full of light saber duels.  And the final DUEL we all expect is touted as being the longest duel ever in a movie.  




The Darth Maul duel (especially the finale with Obi-Wan) was awesome. The Dooku duel was lame - I guess he was supposed to be too good for either Anakin or Obi-Wan to compete with. The Yoda bit was just silly, and the horrible writing only made it worse.  




And the most ironic thing...

The duel in the Original Star Wars was FAR more accurate of what sword fighting (at least from what I've learned in fencing these past few years) really is like...heck, Empire Strikes Back is more accurate (Wide strikes, and a few circles, but most of the moves don't have a 3/4 circular movement to them, which unless used for power, is suicide typically, and a lot of Obi Wan's moves would weren't for power...but were suicidal...Darth Maul had some moves, but moved better, and should have taken them both out in a matter of seconds looking at stance, movement, and sword attacks/defends).

It's amazing that Obi Wan, or one of the others in the TPM movie wasn't cut in half in their first circle swing when all the other bad guy had to do was extend their arm and cut them in half, or stab them through!

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #104 on: May 21, 2004, 12:44:05 pm »
Don't forget the force.

A Jedi can read the mind of an opponent, and know where he is going to strike before he actually strikes.  That is why the Jedi can lightsaber duel for such a long time- they know where every strike is going to hit, and thus, can block every strike, until they tire and slip up once, and in that moment they get stabbed through the chest.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #105 on: May 21, 2004, 12:51:03 pm »
I do think the Jedi can be quite silly at times.

If I were Obi-wan or Qui-gon, when they were on the TradeFed ship at the start of TPM and the 3 shielded Droidekas attacked, I would have destroyed them.

How, you ask?  When they have shields and were firing so rapidly?

Force push.  Bam, they're all down.  Shields can't stop the Force, you know.  Just reach out with the force, find their computer core, and rip it out of it's sockets.

Fighting people?  Use the force to smash their brain flat.

Fighting an army with AT-AT's?  AT-ST's?  Use the Force to knock them over, then use the force to send the downed vehicles sliding into the armies around them.

Fighting a spaceship?  Mind trick the bridge crew to activate self destruct.  Or if the self destruct sequence is complicated, mind trick them to drop the shields to their docking bay (make them think fighters are exiting), then fire torpedoes inside.

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #106 on: May 21, 2004, 12:54:16 pm »
Or like the vulcans did thier most powerful TKs destroyed the welds in an enemies hull plating while it orbited thier planet.

Sethan

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #107 on: May 21, 2004, 01:20:06 pm »
Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #108 on: May 21, 2004, 01:43:59 pm »
Watched a lot of colligate matches when i was at University of Alabama (friend who took basic classes took me). Some went 5 mins or so. Most were over in 2 or 3. Plenty went in a lot less.

20 minutes... they probably had to drag those folks off the mat. They had to be exhausted.

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #109 on: May 21, 2004, 01:52:16 pm »
 If a Jedi used the Force to smash sombodys brain flat, They would be Sith not Jedi......  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #110 on: May 21, 2004, 02:06:44 pm »
My WEG Starwars force user character played telekinetic people tennis all the time.  

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #111 on: May 21, 2004, 02:14:11 pm »
 I guess he was a Sedi ?  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #112 on: May 21, 2004, 02:32:17 pm »
Well the rule books allowed for non sith force users that did not subscribe fully to the jedi code. An example is the witches of Endor (I think.) so we created a "grey order" who were not fully white nore wholy black. This predates ATOC by nearly a decade but it bears out becasue mace windu uses rage to channel his fighting power as an accepted if feared  jedi technique.  

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #113 on: May 21, 2004, 03:20:26 pm »
I have too much love in my heart for Star Wars to truely dislike any of it's movies. Though, I'm sad to say, George Lucas does appear to have his limits. He needs to rediscover whatever gave the magic to the original  trilogy (assuming he had anything to do with it at all. I can't say for sure.)

I have to agree with Praxis and say that the Star Wars microseries by Genndy Tartakovsky (creator of the amazing Samurai Jack) is awesome.  The action in it is stupendous. I can't wait for it to come out on DVD.
 

Elvis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #114 on: May 21, 2004, 09:55:45 pm »
The problem is we are fans and I probably wouldn't go to far out on a limb to say that we grew up with the original trilogy and I think that somewhat clouds our vision. George Lucas had the chance to deliver another trilogy that would "shock and awe" us. He hasn't delivered, he hasn't even come close to meeting expectations; and  the new trilogy lacks any kind of impact. How many lines can you remeber from the first three films? Things like "Use the force Luke.", "May the force be with you." or "I am your father" all show an indication of some kind of influence those movies had on us. What comes from the second trilogy? The new trilogy also really lacks anything really inspirational that effects us. I really don't feel anything toward the characters, except for maybe pity. Are the characters really memorable or the battles all that climatic. No, not really, I loved the first Star Wars, saw it like 15 times during its run at the original Cine Capri in Phoenix, but the second series just lacks. As a final note as with LOTR I think the Academy is just waiting to give the last installment the notice the series deserves.  

 

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #115 on: May 21, 2004, 10:08:02 pm »
In a similar vein, he is also releasing a special edition of his first film THX 1138 in the fall, complete with computer-generated images and edits.  Here's the trailer (Quicktime and a bit of bandwith required).

J. Carney

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #116 on: May 21, 2004, 10:36:52 pm »
 How many lines can you remeber from the first three films? Things like "Use the force Luke.", "May the force be with you." or "I am your father"  




"Scoundrel, scoundrel... I like the sound of that."

Or one even better:

"No reward is worth this!"

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #117 on: May 21, 2004, 11:37:03 pm »
 Ah yes i for got about Vapad, Mace Windu is a force to be reckoned with. I wonder how he is going to be killed?  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #118 on: May 21, 2004, 11:41:15 pm »
I would say either taken by stealth or while distracted, killed by something like a deadfall or explosion or betrayal by a trusted friend.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2004, 11:41:55 pm by Stormbringer »

Ravok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #119 on: May 21, 2004, 11:51:21 pm »
 It would have to be some thing like that. From what im reading you cant even see him move when he gets going, He is so fast.  

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #120 on: May 21, 2004, 11:56:26 pm »
It is possible that a force deadening mechanism or creature could be used. Like the ysilamiri from the thrawn series.

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #121 on: May 22, 2004, 12:52:54 am »
I hope not. I don't know if I can take another midichlorian like debacle.

Also. People, if your going to post spoilers then post spoiler warnings.  
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Tremok »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #122 on: May 22, 2004, 12:59:22 am »
But I'm not because far as I know no one has seen the movie or a script. This was just speculation. We know or think he dies because of what was in the first trilogy about the jedi purge with just three or four jedi or sith apparently surviving. yoda, ben, darth, the emperor. Novels (questionable as to whether they were cannon or not) had a few others.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2004, 01:01:01 am by Stormbringer »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #123 on: May 22, 2004, 01:12:17 am »
Yep the midicalorians sucked some of the life out of the mythos. The ysilamiri did not at least not to an appreciable degree. And with force crystals used to make sabers that interact with the force it would be logical that a dampening field could be engineered. The technology could be lost with the jedi purge and holocrons.

Tremok

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #124 on: May 22, 2004, 01:52:08 am »
Praxis did not seem to post his information in tones of speculation to me. I assumed he got his data form the Star Wars insider thing or from a website or person who has it.  Regardless, I just ask that we be careful.... I cannot count how many times my supsense was damaged to some degree by persons who posted spoilers without spoiler warnings. It has become somewhat of a pet peeve of mine.

This page helps me deal with midicalorians. Lucas kept it all vague enough that I could tolerate it, though I still don't like it. I have a bigger problem with force machines/dampeners. They just don't sit well with me. That machines or animals could deny or manipulate the force, it's will, it's influence... I just don't like it.

As for lightsabers... I always thought they were ordinary devices that only a Jedi could effectively wield.  
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Tremok »

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #125 on: May 22, 2004, 09:36:23 am »
A jedi can only build a saber upon reaching a certain level of attainment with the force and is not considered a jedi unti he or she does so. The crystals used are force sensitive. This is all just semi-cannon from novels and from WEG which is a primary research source for nearly all the novel writers.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Stormbringer »

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #126 on: May 22, 2004, 10:41:43 am »
Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.

Corbomite

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #127 on: May 22, 2004, 10:45:34 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.  




I heard that Yoda does all his own stunt work.

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: Fire George Lucas that would be blasphemy
« Reply #128 on: May 23, 2004, 01:38:18 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

As for TalonClaw's claim that the lightsaber duels needed to go on longer- those things take work and TREMENDOUS amounts of physical exertion. Those guys dance around for WEEKS to give you a five minuet fight scene. And you know that anything longer would be hard to believe. Swordfights (and I'm therefore assuming lightsaber fights) seldom last more than a few minutes... mostly they are measured in seconds. Even a really well-paired fencing duel is often over before you can really tell who scored a touch.  




I've seen one-on-one fights in the SCA last 15-20 minutes.  I've particpated in some that lasted 10.  




Yes, but notice how fast the Jedi fight?  The actors fight for MUCH longer, and it is played in fast-motion on the big screen.  




As I said...Fencing is real fighting (some will say that it's merely a touch, and to some degree that is true...however, it's where it touches...and in practice, when really doing this...it probably WILL leave bruises...so it has some strength to it...we're taught to stab through the object, even if with a blunt edge it will not.  Still, believe it or not, there are some that actually practice with real blades...rather dangerous and usually quite bloody if you ask me, where you hit in fencing typically is targetting for what could be considered the vitals for the type of weapon you are holding overall)...much of SCA is just people who have NO clue as too what they are doing...playing around...course 90% of the people in the Middle ages had less training when in battle Soooo...

I suppose it is rather realistic to that extent...and those more experienced of course WILL do better, and the artform of Western Battle arts does have SOME merit...of course that only applies to those in Europe I would imagine...

On the otherhand, I'd put a world class fencer against the SCA's best anyday...and in a fair fight...I'd bet on the fencer...100% of the time.

Problem with the starwars battles...their so obviously stage fighting...that it's obvious that a Jedi would be killed in less than a minute by someone who REALLY knew how to wield a weapon.

Perhaps that's why the battles are so short...the Jedi AND the Sith aren't really all that skilled (except when a sith fights a computer animated green elf fairie that looks so hilarious...I think most fencers would either fall down laughing and be killed, OR take a few steps into an empty area devoid of objects for the green jumper to jump off of) so obviously their battles can't be that long...

 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Dash Jones »