Topic: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....  (Read 5149 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WickedZombie45

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #20 on: May 07, 2004, 12:08:17 pm »
Actually, I built an Eclipse years ago and it *should* still be at the old OSF site. As far as I'm aware, it's the only one ever made for the game. Though, it could use an upgrade....

I probably won't build any fighters since Firehawk's are more than adequate - I mean, how much detail can you cram into puny little ships that you barely see in-game anyway?

Dizzy

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #21 on: May 07, 2004, 01:57:48 pm »
Thats the point, WZ... U dont want to cram a lot of detail in them... Having 16 X,Y or A wings in addition to 6x Imperial assault shuttles and 48 Tie Fighters... PLUS some capital ships... How much CPU horsepower are you gonna need to have to run a mission like that and have it not slow down to 2 or 3 frames a sec?

I dont recall just how detailed FH's models are, but if the little ones are tiny... then can someone use a poly reducer?

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #22 on: May 07, 2004, 03:01:07 pm »
Well, that is a seriously awsome Ship ya got there.  I look forward to blowing her to peices.    I think i have to add in my own two cents too lol.
-----------------------------------------------
Star Wars technology is not 100% superior to Star Trek.  Did you know that when a Star Destroyers shields are up they lose Long Range Communications?  It?s stated in ?The Last Command? of the Thrawn Trilogy.  Their shields themselves are crap.  They have two different types of shields, Physical and Energy, (well that?s not what they call them but that?s what they are).  Physical shields stop physical objects like torpedoes or small craft.  With those shields up, they cannot launch fighters or missiles of their own.  Energy shields stop energy weapons, such as Lasers.  Shields take up so much energy; they are not capable of being on at the same time.  Most Star Wars fans only compare Federation Technology to Star Wars, but there are plenty of Trek Weapons that would kill the Empire.  The Breen CRM-114 is a good example.  A Storm Trooper?s armor may be strong, but this weapon would defiantly and literally blow them apart.  There are many more things we could continue with, but really this isn?t a Trek vs. Wars thread so I?ll stop now, lol.  I?m sure Praxis would like to continue else wear though he always seems to want too?
     

WickedZombie45

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #23 on: May 07, 2004, 06:14:04 pm »
Heh, Firehawk's models are probably the last ships that need a poly reducer. He tends to keep his ships as playable as possible and those fighters of his are perfect for squadron actions.

You basically just reworded what I'd already said - you don't need a lot of detail for fighters since they're so small and I don't see a reason to make my own versions when they'll end up being carbon copies anyway.

Mariner

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #24 on: May 07, 2004, 07:04:36 pm »
Will you ever consider redoing the other ships featured in the OSF site, or atleast move them all onto a seperate section of DRS? I think it would help in trying to find those models.

But, how are the Andromedan Stations coming? If you need an idea or two for them, I could probably sketch a few over the weekend if you need.

Also, will you consider making some of the TOS-era ships, like the Surya, Coventry, Coronado, Sherman, etc. from your Patton? I think that they all could your magic touch.

« Last Edit: May 07, 2004, 07:11:11 pm by Mariner »

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #25 on: May 07, 2004, 07:39:37 pm »
Quote:


-----------------------------------------------
Star Wars technology is not 100% superior to Star Trek.  Did you know that when a Star Destroyers shields are up they lose Long Range Communications?  It?s stated in ?The Last Command? of the Thrawn Trilogy.  Their shields themselves are crap.




Long range communications = Hyperwave, which allows them to have instant communication across the galaxy.  Something which the Federation doesn't have.

Even the Empire's short range communications are longer than the Federation's long range.  The Federation's long range communications travel at 200,000 times lightspeed...twice the speed of warp 9.9...yet the Empire's long range is instantaneous.  The Empire's short range is also instantaneous, but it only covers a couple dozen/hundred light years.

Don't forget, shields up or not, Voyager was too far from Earth to contact them from the Delta Quadrant.  A Star Destroyer could easily use hyperwave to contact their homeworld from the other side of the galaxy.


Quote:

  They have two different types of shields, Physical and Energy, (well that?s not what they call them but that?s what they are).  Physical shields stop physical objects like torpedoes or small craft.  With those shields up, they cannot launch fighters or missiles of their own.  Energy shields stop energy weapons, such as Lasers.  Shields take up so much energy; they are not capable of being on at the same time.




You talk about it like it's the only types of shields.

Examples of ray shields:

Exhaust port on the Death Star- specifically stated to be ray shielded, obviously, since particle shielding would block the exhaust from coming out.

Gungan shields- also ray shields.

There are no known examples in the movies of particle shields in the movies, just books, which is all well and good.

However, there is another type of shield- DEFLECTOR SHIELDS.

Read the OFFICIAL manuals- such as the Episode 2 Incredible Cross Sections, written by an astrophysicist working with the Lucasarts design team, it is one of the only manuals ever to be declared Canon by LucasArts.

There are shields that block both- thats the type used on starships.

Quote:


  Most Star Wars fans only compare Federation Technology to Star Wars, but there are plenty of Trek Weapons that would kill the Empire.  The Breen CRM-114 is a good example.  A Storm Trooper?s armor may be strong, but this weapon would defiantly and literally blow them apart.




Same way an E-web would easily vaporize Federation troops, and a blaster rifle would mow down enemies.

I'd love to see Boba Fett on a Borg Cube- since Star Wars weapons aren't like these silly "phased" weapons in Star Trek, there is no way the Borg'd be able to adapt...it'd be funny to watch them march forward and be mowed down.

Quote:


  There are many more things we could continue with, but really this isn?t a Trek vs. Wars thread so I?ll stop now, lol.  I?m sure Praxis would like to continue else wear though he always seems to want too?
       




Bring it on

You don't know who you're messing with...Maybe if I get a little more free time today I'll go start up a thread in the debate forum...

EDIT:  Where'd the debate and OT forums go?  NOOO!
« Last Edit: May 07, 2004, 07:44:15 pm by Praxis »

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #26 on: May 07, 2004, 07:40:03 pm »
BTW I've already release a Star Wars mod for OP a while back (requires Chris Jones' TNG Mega Mod to play the Star Trek side), and am working on a SFC3 one.  Screenshots in the Mod forum.

WZ, think I could use your ISD in the SFC3 mod?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Praxis »

InragedSith

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #27 on: May 07, 2004, 07:57:13 pm »
Quote:

Star Wars technology is not 100% superior to Star Trek.




True

 
Quote:

 Did you know that when a Star Destroyers shields are up they lose Long Range Communications?  It?s stated in ?The Last Command? of the Thrawn Trilogy.




I guess that's true nothing above quasi-canon appears to dispute that

But it's a minor disadvantage

 
Quote:

Their shields themselves are crap.  They have two different types of shields, Physical and Energy, (well that?s not what they call them but that?s what they are).




Crap? A Clone Wars era troop transpots shields can handle teraton level bombardment

In your opinion that's "crap" compared to Trek shields and weapons it's unbeatable

Quote:

Physical shields stop physical objects like torpedoes or small craft.  With those shields up, they cannot launch fighters or missiles of their own.




Forgot to add that particle shields can be raised and lowered in miliseconds to allow missile and torpedo launches

Quote:

 Energy shields stop energy weapons, such as Lasers.  Shields take up so much energy; they are not capable of being on at the same time.




Where the hell is that from?

Shields can't be kept up 24/7, but both shields have to be up at once in battle situations otherwise ships would suffer quick deaths

Quote:

Most Star Wars fans only compare Federation Technology to Star Wars,




Here's why...

We know alot about Fed Tech and Jack crap about other Trek tech

 
Quote:

but there are plenty of Trek Weapons that would kill the Empire.




I doubt that

2 sector fleets are all the Empire needs to bring the alpha quadrant under its boot

1 sector fleet for the Federation, the second for the Klingons

The other powers in the quadrant would either sign non-aggression pacts or willingly join the Empire

Quote:

 The Breen CRM-114 is a good example.  A Storm Trooper?s armor may be strong, but this weapon would defiantly and literally blow them apart.




True but the Empire does have tanks and walkers to back its troops up

And E-Webs would tear hordes of Breen to shreds

Would the Empire have any interest in the Breen?

Would the Breen want to fight the Empire?

Would the Breen give this weapon to thier former enemies?

Quote:

 There are many more things we could continue with, but really this isn?t a Trek vs. Wars thread so I?ll stop now, lol.  I?m sure Praxis would like to continue else wear though he always seems to want too?
       




Attention Pro Trek vs. debaters lets leave the debate out of this thread

If you have a hankering to continiue debating Trek vs. Wars go here http://groups.msn.com/StarTrekVsStarWars/messageboard.msnw    
« Last Edit: May 07, 2004, 08:05:58 pm by InragedSith »

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #28 on: May 07, 2004, 08:35:15 pm »
No...please...not an MSN group...nooooo...

Maybe I should host my own forum, lol :P

InragedSith

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #29 on: May 07, 2004, 08:56:12 pm »
Then how about...

http:\\bbs.stardestroyer.net it's a Trekkies worst nightmare but all well

www.spacebattles.com The debate is basicly dead here all sides are in agreement since Darkstar was banned that Wars would win no questions asked

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&group=alt.startrek.vs.starwars Heres a relic one of the places the online debate originated from
« Last Edit: May 07, 2004, 08:56:49 pm by InragedSith »

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #30 on: May 07, 2004, 09:15:58 pm »
Lets see...Stardestroyer.net is both a warsie and trekkies worst nightmare.

You go in there, make any kind of post, they call it a "me-too" post if its a joke or "repetitive" if its about ST vs SW or call you a moron if you support ST...its almost impossible to make a post without it gettting locked in the ST vs SW section, due to overzealous moderation.

Spacebattles.com were a bunch of whiners during the Darkstar era, and now they've just dropped it.

I want to start a thread on Taldren, but theres no more public Debate or Off Topic forums to post it in, and people would get mad if it was in General chat or SFC forums.

And it wouldn't fit that well in the Cool and Refreshing forum.

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #31 on: May 07, 2004, 09:17:04 pm »
StarDestroyer.net is a horrible place to debate.  They put down Trek without even a second thought.  It?s all like "Well that Phaser couldn?t penetrate that armor so that Phaser is inferior."   Or "That Phaser vaporized that armor so that armor is inferior."  It?s that same garbage over and over.  They never stop to think that maybe Trek and Wars are not superior to each other, but that they both have there ups and downs.  Also, Voyager did make contact with the Alpha Quadrant via the Midas Array.  It was a good clear signal that reached 70,000 light-years.  There was a limited time to make contact, but I?m sure Starfleet was more concerned with the Invasion of the Alpha/Beta Quadrant by the Dominion.  Also, if Canon material is only found in the Movies, and the only confirmed canon Wars books are the technical manuals, then doesn?t that mean that the Novels (excluding the Thrawn series because of the "Authorized Continuation" on the back), are non-canon.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #32 on: May 07, 2004, 09:21:50 pm »
Quote:

Also, Voyager did make contact with the Alpha Quadrant via the Midas Array.  It was a good clear signal that reached 70,000 light-years.  There was a limited time to make contact, but I?m sure Starfleet was more concerned with the Invasion of the Alpha/Beta Quadrant by the Dominion.


 

*Exactly* my point- they had to use ALIEN technology far more advanced than their own to contact starfleet- they're technology wasn't up to the task.

All Star Destroyers have to do is lower their shields and they can easily transmit 70,000 lightyears without breaking a sweat.



Quote:

Also, if Canon material is only found in the Movies, and the only confirmed canon Wars books are the technical manuals, then doesn?t that mean that the Novels (excluding the Thrawn series because of the "Authorized Continuation" on the back), are non-canon.




I don't see what you're getting at...

All the novels are semi-canon...George Lucas worked closely with the novel authors, determined the direction of the story, who would live or die, etc.  Not the same for the Star Trek novels.

The Star Wars tech manuals are *not* canon, with the exception of the ICS, which is the only one that was declared canon by LucasArts.

And it states that a quad turbolaser on the Acclamator is 200 gigatons.  

Shouldn't take more than a couple hits to wipe out a Sovereign...

BTW SovereignEmpire, what's your MSN?  I tried adding your enterpriseviii@hotmail.com, nothing.

 

SovereignEmpire

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #33 on: May 07, 2004, 09:41:12 pm »
Is there an alternative link to the DRS?  Before when the site was down, it was just the server?s problem, now it seems to be gone completely.  It could be just me though.

Praxis

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #34 on: May 07, 2004, 09:43:53 pm »
It went down a few minutes ago, I was talking with WZ when it happened...

The entire Nightsoft site went down in flames.

DonKarnage

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #35 on: May 07, 2004, 10:36:48 pm »
well insted of small tie fighter why not make small enterprise class for fighter (fighter that are small size enterprise class ship), that would be cool to see insted of tie-fighter or anyother fighter from starwars.

Reverend

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #36 on: May 07, 2004, 11:11:00 pm »
Really nice work; I have always enjoyed Star Wars... shocked after reading this thread, always thought Star Trek was way more advanced.... drat.
Wicked Z, that is a beauty of a ship, like everything you do.

Do you plan on making a Super Star Destroyer? I know one exists, but.... well... you know...

   

InragedSith

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #37 on: May 07, 2004, 11:54:27 pm »
Quote:

 Also, Voyager did make contact with the Alpha Quadrant via the Midas Array.




Which was a new breakthrough by the Feds and experimental

Quote:

It was a good clear signal that reached 70,000 light-years.




The times I saw it used the reception was crappy

 
Quote:

but I?m sure Starfleet was more concerned with the Invasion of the Alpha/Beta Quadrant by the Dominion.




The war was over by the time the Array was completed

 
Quote:

Also, if Canon material is only found in the Movies,




You mean "Lucas' Canon policy"TM brought to you by Darkstar?

If "only Star Wars movies are canon" is your point of view then concerning Trek your p.o.v. must be that TOS is noncanon Federation propaganda, the TMP novelization is canon, Trek movies 1-4 are canon, ST5 is not canon, TUC is quasi-canon, only TNG seasons 1-4 are canon,  and that TNG seasons 5-7, Generations, DS9, First Contact, Insurrection, Voyager, Enterprise, and Nemesis are all not canon

"It isn't Star Trek til I say it's Star Trek"-Gene Roddenberry

 
Quote:

and the only confirmed canon Wars books are the technical manuals,




Don't forget the movie novelizations

And it's only the ICS manuals Essential Guides still is quasi-canon

Quote:

 then doesn?t that mean that the Novels (excluding the Thrawn series because of the "Authorized Continuation" on the back), are non-canon.  




The Thrawn series and all other books that lack an infinities symbol are quasi-canon

manitoba

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #38 on: May 08, 2004, 01:33:29 am »
Quote:

Really nice work; I have always enjoyed Star Wars... shocked after reading this thread, always thought Star Trek was way more advanced.... drat.
Wicked Z, that is a beauty of a ship, like everything you do.

Do you plan on making a Super Star Destroyer? I know one exists, but.... well... you know...

   





hey reverand i have the super star destroyer i will email it to u shortly ok.  

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: This ain't your local bulk cruiser....
« Reply #39 on: May 08, 2004, 04:56:07 am »
WZ, I know where to get ref pix of a fan made SSD that basicly looks like a more  modern SD, much like the Sov is to the galaxy...if you are interested.