Topic: Karemma  (Read 1751 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Karemma
« on: April 07, 2004, 11:22:10 pm »
Any karemma vessel for sfc2op please link

adam out

ModelsPlease

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2004, 01:42:57 am »
 

 

KAREMMAN VESSEL

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Length 220 meters
Crew 23

 
 
 
 
History:
 
Medium-sized starship of Karemman registry with a crew of 23. A Karamman vessel was destroyed by Jem'Hadar ships after it rendezvoused with the Starship Defiant in 2372 to discuss their trade agreement with the Ferengi.
DS9 "Starship Down" ; Star Trek Encyclopedia II


Hope that helps.If someone has modeled them I would like a link as well please.
 
-MP
 ModelsPlease@aol.com
   

 



   

Futurama_Guy

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2004, 07:43:53 am »
I'm not sure the owner of that website appreciates you  stealing his bandwidth hotlinking all of those pictures, no?   Adim??....

Perhaps a simple link to  here would be more acceptable....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Futurama_Guy »

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2004, 07:20:52 pm »
Sorry guys, I didnt want info, lol lol, i meant the ship itself in mod format for sfc2


adam out

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2004, 08:42:13 pm »
They reused the model as a Bajoran ship in the DS9 ep "Shadows and Symbols."  I always thought that there should be more Bajoran ships in SFC.

Futurama_Guy

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2004, 09:06:45 pm »
Quote:

Sorry guys, I didnt want info, lol lol, i meant the ship itself in mod format for sfc2


adam out  




I'm aware of that, I was moreso pointing out that the bandwidth bandit there is screwing the owner of that site everytime someone reads this post.  I was hoping the Admins here would notice that becuase it's not what you call "proper internet-etiquette".

But yes, I've posted a "model wanted" on this ship before and there has been no takers.  

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2004, 09:58:12 pm »
Sorry bro, the message was intended for modelsplease, but your rite, the bandwith thingy, i hate that, thanks alot for the fyi, and i really cant believe they havent made a freighter for the dominion yet,

we got fed, klink, rommie, cardy, and i whole bunch of other freighters, but no dominion, thanks though

adam out

ModelsPlease

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2004, 02:52:19 am »
Sorry I didn't know I was stealing anything.I was only trying to help.And none of that work is original.You can find all those pictures and screen caps on 4 or 5 other sites.So if I made anyone mad I apologize.  

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2004, 06:31:44 am »
destynova had one and dissapeared with it, and gtea might do one over at the BC forums. Might take a while he's got telarians now.

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #9 on: April 10, 2004, 12:47:46 am »
wow thats kool, I think i have an old 3dmax version, but when i convert the textures dont make it thru

adam out

Futurama_Guy

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #10 on: April 10, 2004, 01:21:25 am »
Hey if anyone has any version of the ship, such as you Adam, feel free to email it to me and I ought to be able to convert it to SFC or even if you want, send the one you converted and have texture probs with and I can likely fix it, well hopefully, I've been pretty lucky lately  

You can email it/them to : futuramaguy@hotmail.com

Futurama_Guy

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #11 on: April 10, 2004, 01:34:21 am »

I realize most people are not aware of bandwidth theft or how it works, but I belong to a forum that is hardcore against it and I guess their ideals have got the best of me.   Anyway, there is a good website (#1 Google search result) that discusses it:  Bandwidth Theft.

But in short...

 
Quote:

 The person whose site the image is on that you are linking to for the source of the image is paying to display their image on your site.

That site owner is paying one way or another to have that graphic displayed on the web. Perhaps they pay a monthly fee. Perhaps, they use a 'free' web service, however, they have limits on the amount of bandwidth they are allowed to use. By linking to the graphic, YOU have STOLEN from them one way or another.

 




Anyway, its nothing personal, and I know I'm far from an Administrator around here, but I do know who has the site and I'm just watching out for them.  

sandman69247

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #12 on: April 10, 2004, 09:22:43 am »
NP, FG. Next time though, you might want to tone down the "feel" of the post, as there are those who don't really understand about bandwidth. But then, maybe I'm being jumpy...I remember the flame wars from awhile ago that almost cost us ALL the old hands...hell we're still getting a few of them back every once in awhile. Just try the "milk and sugar" approach first, then if you get slammed by someone, we'll all know it was an innocent suggestion.  

Reverend

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #13 on: April 10, 2004, 11:40:16 am »
Quote:


I realize most people are not aware of bandwidth theft or how it works, but I belong to a forum that is hardcore against it and I guess their ideals have got the best of me.   Anyway, there is a good website (#1 Google search result) that discusses it:  Bandwidth Theft.

But in short...

 
Quote:

 The person whose site the image is on that you are linking to for the source of the image is paying to display their image on your site.

That site owner is paying one way or another to have that graphic displayed on the web. Perhaps they pay a monthly fee. Perhaps, they use a 'free' web service, however, they have limits on the amount of bandwidth they are allowed to use. By linking to the graphic, YOU have STOLEN from them one way or another.

 




Anyway, its nothing personal, and I know I'm far from an Administrator around here, but I do know who has the site and I'm just watching out for them.    



drat, and I was just going to change my pre-approved sig pic to that one on their site of the little eyes... ah well..
   

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: Karemma
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2004, 01:30:53 am »
gimme a couple of days to look thru the drive, its somewhere around there, but i havent had time to organize the models and stuff, so itll be awhile b4 i find it


adam out