Topic: What I would like to see next for the game  (Read 5784 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

RazalYllib

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #40 on: February 06, 2004, 07:33:54 am »
Turn Based F&E with battle hex resolution on a first come first serve basis within the DV, with full Command and Control using Command Ratings, Order of Battle, Reaction Movment, etc....

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #41 on: February 06, 2004, 08:00:47 am »
How about a futuristic action RPG?  

NannerSlug

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #42 on: February 06, 2004, 09:29:02 am »
an emmerism trek game would pwnzer.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #43 on: February 06, 2004, 10:48:56 am »
Quote:

How about a futuristic action RPG?  




A computerized Gurps Prime Directive maybe?  

Davey E

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #44 on: February 06, 2004, 11:34:08 am »
 
Quote:

Turn-based F&E with tactical combat resolved on GSA

I miss General War  


 

We still have it
Its called the VG (Virtual Galaxy)

http://198.65.253.239/VG_Rules.htm

map
http://www.stoc.info/  

TOCXOBearslayer

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #45 on: February 06, 2004, 02:20:25 pm »
Davey,

The new site is looking good!!!

 

FFZ

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #46 on: February 07, 2004, 10:36:22 am »
 I'd like to see Andromidans and Tholians, the forgotten races of SFB.    

Raniz Murjuri

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #47 on: February 07, 2004, 02:13:03 pm »
Ohh i found another post on it...

I'm agreeing to  RPG style. full PvP version on 1 Massive Multiplayer Server.

Like defined in these posts.

 HERE

and

 HERE

see ya in the next disscusion about this.  

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #48 on: February 07, 2004, 06:34:25 pm »
For those a little slow on the uptake ...

Quote:

How about a futuristic action RPG?  




----------->       Black 9  

Jaeih t`Radaik

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #49 on: February 11, 2004, 02:37:39 am »
Quote:

Turn-based F&E with tactical combat resolved on GSA  

I miss General War    




I think this is really cool too. I've never played F&E, but I did almost buy it once. I like the idea of an RTS 'Empire overview' game and the SFC-style battle resolution. You could have it with teams, even. Someone who isn't a good pilot but good with the strategy aspect can be the Supreme Commander, and a fleet of good pilots (on each side) could be called in to fight a vital battle. Things like Organia, that is, not your average police action against pirates (although they could be included too).

I am, as ever,  

Khalee

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #50 on: February 11, 2004, 06:08:33 am »
While all these Ideas are nice I would just like to see a seperate stand alone either RTS and or Turnbased computer version of F&E. And no one really answerd the rest, would Actavisions license cover smothing like that. Myself I dont think it would. But im no leagle expert.  

kv1at3485

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #51 on: February 11, 2004, 10:58:37 am »
And another thing.  How about a fully integrated and functional mission/campaign editor?  (I'm thinking something along the lines of the editor found in FreeSpace I and II.)

It would open up single- and multi-player mission/campaign creation for a lot of people, and would add to the longevity of the game.

Khalee

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #52 on: February 11, 2004, 11:01:41 am »
Oh good idea  A Mission editor would be definetly needed.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #53 on: February 11, 2004, 12:25:04 pm »
Quote:

While all these Ideas are nice I would just like to see a seperate stand alone either RTS and or Turnbased computer version of F&E. And no one really answerd the rest, would Actavisions license cover smothing like that. Myself I dont think it would. But im no leagle expert.  




Could Taldren assist ADB in a PC based version of Federation and Empire?   Would that even be an Activision issue?  

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #54 on: February 11, 2004, 01:44:47 pm »
I know this is going to sound stupid but the hell with I need to know, what is RTS


adam out

DH123

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #55 on: February 11, 2004, 03:10:14 pm »
Quote:

I know this is going to sound stupid but the hell with I need to know, what is RTS


adam out  



Real Time Strategy, like Star Trek: Armada (which is a real fun game by the way . . .)  

The_Infiltrator

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #56 on: February 12, 2004, 10:41:55 pm »
Yeeesh. RTS? Makes my skin crawl.

Since Hyper hasn't shown up yet, I'll say what we wait for is of course GAW.

Oh, nice pic DH, though the 56k crowd probabally wants to kill you. And again, we run in STOC something very like the campaign that you wish to play.  

Mr. Hypergol

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #57 on: February 13, 2004, 10:36:06 am »
 
Quote:

 Since Hyper hasn't shown up yet, I'll say what we wait for is of course GAW.




Well said.

I just wonder what is going on in Star Trek gaming in general right now.  We haven't heard much lately out of Paramount or Activision.

I just read on Trektoday.com that Enterprise's future is in question.  It might not get cancelled, but it sure isn't pleasing the ratings watchers at Paramount and UPN.  This seems to play well into Activision's argument that Paramount isn't supporting Trek well enough.

What is going on with the liscening issues I wonder?  Are they going to re-issue the Trek liscenses to some other company or companies, or are they going to let Activision just sit on the liscense they have and do nothing with it?  What a waste!!

Hopefully they will issue the liscening in a way that allows for an "all eras" SFC GAW- type game that has a strategic F&E level along with the current tactical levels we already know and love, kinda like the Total War series has done.  I'd like to see tactical game be an SFB based game that expands to other eras like this guy did:

http://www.smileylich.com/sfb/index.html

But hey, you guys already know what I want....don't you?  

Sethan

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #58 on: February 13, 2004, 12:40:30 pm »
Yep - one more vote for an 'all eras GaW here'.

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #59 on: February 13, 2004, 01:12:41 pm »
That is a good game, with SFC graphics, I would enjoy it even more


adam out