Topic: What I would like to see next for the game  (Read 5502 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Khalee

  • Guest
What I would like to see next for the game
« on: February 05, 2004, 06:02:03 pm »
A RTS version OF Federation and Empires  and I would not think Actavision would have any control over something like that.

I love RTS games. Can never have enough of them.

And Armada and Armada 2 or Bridge Comander dont fit the bill either. And neither does the D2 or D3  no mater how much the people here have done with them and they have done some wonderfull things with what they have, they are still are a poor mans version of  Federation and Empire.

Thats it thats all I want.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2004, 06:23:53 pm »
Turn-based F&E with tactical combat resolved on GSA  

I miss General War    

Khalee

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2004, 06:34:53 pm »
And another thing it has to be compleatly, totaly, uterly Modable no Hard codeing of anything.  

kv1at3485

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2004, 12:21:32 am »
Complex economic system with supply lines, etc..

(I know, I know, I've harped on this before...  )

RazalYllib

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2004, 07:33:54 am »
Turn Based F&E with battle hex resolution on a first come first serve basis within the DV, with full Command and Control using Command Ratings, Order of Battle, Reaction Movment, etc....

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2004, 08:00:47 am »
How about a futuristic action RPG?  

NannerSlug

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2004, 09:29:02 am »
an emmerism trek game would pwnzer.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2004, 10:48:56 am »
Quote:

How about a futuristic action RPG?  




A computerized Gurps Prime Directive maybe?  

Davey E

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2004, 11:34:08 am »
 
Quote:

Turn-based F&E with tactical combat resolved on GSA

I miss General War  


 

We still have it
Its called the VG (Virtual Galaxy)

http://198.65.253.239/VG_Rules.htm

map
http://www.stoc.info/  

TOCXOBearslayer

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2004, 02:20:25 pm »
Davey,

The new site is looking good!!!

 

FFZ

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2004, 10:36:22 am »
 I'd like to see Andromidans and Tholians, the forgotten races of SFB.    

Raniz Murjuri

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2004, 02:13:03 pm »
Ohh i found another post on it...

I'm agreeing to  RPG style. full PvP version on 1 Massive Multiplayer Server.

Like defined in these posts.

 HERE

and

 HERE

see ya in the next disscusion about this.  

Cleaven

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2004, 06:34:25 pm »
For those a little slow on the uptake ...

Quote:

How about a futuristic action RPG?  




----------->       Black 9  

Jaeih t`Radaik

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2004, 02:37:39 am »
Quote:

Turn-based F&E with tactical combat resolved on GSA  

I miss General War    




I think this is really cool too. I've never played F&E, but I did almost buy it once. I like the idea of an RTS 'Empire overview' game and the SFC-style battle resolution. You could have it with teams, even. Someone who isn't a good pilot but good with the strategy aspect can be the Supreme Commander, and a fleet of good pilots (on each side) could be called in to fight a vital battle. Things like Organia, that is, not your average police action against pirates (although they could be included too).

I am, as ever,  

Khalee

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2004, 06:08:33 am »
While all these Ideas are nice I would just like to see a seperate stand alone either RTS and or Turnbased computer version of F&E. And no one really answerd the rest, would Actavisions license cover smothing like that. Myself I dont think it would. But im no leagle expert.  

kv1at3485

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2004, 10:58:37 am »
And another thing.  How about a fully integrated and functional mission/campaign editor?  (I'm thinking something along the lines of the editor found in FreeSpace I and II.)

It would open up single- and multi-player mission/campaign creation for a lot of people, and would add to the longevity of the game.

Khalee

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2004, 11:01:41 am »
Oh good idea  A Mission editor would be definetly needed.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2004, 12:25:04 pm »
Quote:

While all these Ideas are nice I would just like to see a seperate stand alone either RTS and or Turnbased computer version of F&E. And no one really answerd the rest, would Actavisions license cover smothing like that. Myself I dont think it would. But im no leagle expert.  




Could Taldren assist ADB in a PC based version of Federation and Empire?   Would that even be an Activision issue?  

nx_adam_1701

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2004, 01:44:47 pm »
I know this is going to sound stupid but the hell with I need to know, what is RTS


adam out

DH123

  • Guest
Re: What I would like to see next for the game
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2004, 03:10:14 pm »
Quote:

I know this is going to sound stupid but the hell with I need to know, what is RTS


adam out  



Real Time Strategy, like Star Trek: Armada (which is a real fun game by the way . . .)