Well, "insider trading" is basically acting upon (by way of buying and selling securities) priveledged information that is not known to the public.
I'm not sure how that would apply to your scenario unless someone on the "inside" made transaction decisions based upon "inside knowledge" (read: not public). As J'inn says...if it takes place in a trial, it's public record unless there's a gag order.
Without knowing more about the case, I can't tell if there was any "insider trading" involved. However, if there was, the SEC will be all over it, as will the media. That's newsworthy...heheh