Topic: Another review of Galactica 2003  (Read 18079 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

EmeraldEdge

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #80 on: November 29, 2003, 11:32:06 pm »
Well, not sure where the rifled barrels are, but if they are on the Vipers, that could be because they are meant for atmospheric flight as well as space flight, so they would need to be accurate there.

I don't mind an updating of technology and stuff.  I always applaud using more realistic physics, that isn't what bothers me.  The combat and stuff looked cool in the stuff I saw, it's the other things that I found bothered me.  In several reviews they comment on #6's spine glowing when she's having sex.  Now how lame is that?  Not exactly something you would expect to see in modern sci-fi.  More akin to some of the old corny stuff that is unwatchable.  Doesn't Baltar notice?  I mean, really.  

I also agree on the reason for changing the sex of the characters.  I dont' mind changing Boomer that much.  He was a supporting character, but I must agree that the reasoning for changing Starbuck seems pretty flimsy.  If they really wanted to go through that male/female dynamic, there were characters from the old series that were female pilots after a while, and I wouldn't have any problem with that character being a capable pilot right from the get go and having a larger role.

I think my biggest problem with bullets in space is the amount of cargo space supplies would take up.  Where do they store all the ammo?  What happens when they run out?  Can they reasonably hold enough ammo to stock all those fighters for battle after battle, as well as all the ammo for the rail guns, etc. and still have room for all the fighters, support equipment, etc.?  They are making a huge journey, now if they make that part of the story that's fine, but I bet it ends up being more of a Voyager thing.  They have unlimited unless someone wants to tell a story about it early on, but it will quickly become a non-issue (and it would certainly be interesting if all the alien races they come across used the same size/shape/type of ordinance, wouldn't it?).  I'm all for being more realistic militarily, but the lack of computers on the bridge for some things "because they don't allow networked computers onboard military vessels".  Well, what about non-networked ones then?  Probably more effective than a grease pencil, I would imagine.  What's with corded phones everywhere?  That's certainly not modern tech, even for us, is it?

Anyway, my biggest beef is with what's been done to the story overall, and the characters within.  I still look forward to watching it, but at this point, from what I've read, I think a different direction would have been better.  

Aldaron

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #81 on: November 30, 2003, 11:52:09 am »
Quote:



  What's with corded phones everywhere?  That's certainly not modern tech, even for us, is it?

Anyway, my biggest beef is with what's been done to the story overall, and the characters within.  I still look forward to watching it, but at this point, from what I've read, I think a different direction would have been better.  




As a matter of fact yes the corded "phone" are modern. They don't use any electricity so if the ship loses power communications remain intact. Your voice supplies the power to send the message over the wires.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2003, 11:52:56 am by Aldaron »

EmeraldEdge

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #82 on: November 30, 2003, 12:47:30 pm »
Um, I believe that along the way, corded phones do actually use electricity, do they not?  they are just not attached to the normal electric network.   The voice doesn't actually power the phone, but it is taken and amplified by the microphone in the reciever, then sent down the line in various forms, through wires.  The distance the voice travels in a phone line, would require amplification otherwise you end up with a short range string and tin can situation, don't you?  The lines could be severed as well, so loss of power to the phone system, or loss of line connection could dump the communications.  One would assume that a ship like that would have a backup power system (at least one) to maintain power to vital systems during a main power outage anyway.  If all systems were to go down, you've probably got a lot more to worry about I'd imagine.  

hobbesmaster

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #83 on: November 30, 2003, 01:06:14 pm »
Quote:

Um, I believe that along the way, corded phones do actually use electricity, do they not?  they are just not attached to the normal electric network.   The voice doesn't actually power the phone, but it is taken and amplified by the microphone in the reciever, then sent down the line in various forms, through wires.  The distance the voice travels in a phone line, would require amplification otherwise you end up with a short range string and tin can situation, don't you?  The lines could be severed as well, so loss of power to the phone system, or loss of line connection could dump the communications.  One would assume that a ship like that would have a backup power system (at least one) to maintain power to vital systems during a main power outage anyway.  If all systems were to go down, you've probably got a lot more to worry about I'd imagine.  




I'd imagine they'd be concerned about jamming with a wireless communications system; especially during boarding actions.  

EmeraldEdge

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #84 on: November 30, 2003, 01:45:57 pm »
Yeah, I could buy that reasoning, but combined with the grease pencil thing and lack of tech because "Adama doesn't want it" (There was a stated effort to make the show more realistic to our military, do captains of ships get to deny an order to bring their ship in for upgrades?), it kind of spells out trying to make it look a certain way.  

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #85 on: November 30, 2003, 02:09:32 pm »
From here:

Quote:

The first battlestars were intentionally designed to be low tech; phones with cords, manually operated doors and valves, and the most basic computer systems (none of them are networked together), all designed to operate in combat against an enemy who could infiltrate and disrupt all but the most basic systems.



BortaS

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #86 on: November 30, 2003, 02:21:41 pm »
Quote:

Yeah, I could buy that reasoning, but combined with the grease pencil thing and lack of tech because "Adama doesn't want it" (There was a stated effort to make the show more realistic to our military, do captains of ships get to deny an order to bring their ship in for upgrades?), it kind of spells out trying to make it look a certain way.    




Their website said things had to be low tech because of the cylon's ability to infiltrate technology.  If you keep anything in a computer, the cylon's will be able to get into it.  So the grease pencils and corded phones and no ship wide computer networks are just a security measure.

EmeraldEdge

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #87 on: November 30, 2003, 02:56:49 pm »
Quote:

Following the defeat of the Cylons, the Colonial Fleet built a new second generation battlestar with the Galactica being the first of the new battlestars replacing the original Galactica.




From the same page.  Thus the battlestar in the new series isn't one of the first (which are the ones described as being so low tech), it's actually a second generation Battlestar.  Additinally, there was comment about how Adama had not allowed advanced Tech upgrades on the new Galactica, it should be noted that he isn't an admiral, and is supposed to be a "relic", why would he be allowed to dictate such a thing rather than having to follow orders and bring his ship in for upgrades (additionally, it was said that the Galactica was the first of the second gen/high tech Battlestars, so it should have been built with the high tech in it alread, especially since the Cylons wars were over at the time)  Now, supposedly they still have computers onboard, but "the most basic" systems.  Couldn't they Cylons just invade the important ones, if they have such remote infiltration capabilities?

The Colonial fleet eventually had 120 Battlestars at the time of the Cylon "sneak attack".  Interesting that a single battestar with most of it's heavies discharged and half the ship turned into a museum would have a fighting chance then.  Weren't there just 12 in the original series?  Seems a little more believable, imo.  

Aldaron

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #88 on: November 30, 2003, 04:02:41 pm »
Quote:

Um, I believe that along the way, corded phones do actually use electricity, do they not?  they are just not attached to the normal electric network.   The voice doesn't actually power the phone, but it is taken and amplified by the microphone in the reciever, then sent down the line in various forms, through wires.  The distance the voice travels in a phone line, would require amplification otherwise you end up with a short range string and tin can situation, don't you?  The lines could be severed as well, so loss of power to the phone system, or loss of line connection could dump the communications.  One would assume that a ship like that would have a backup power system (at least one) to maintain power to vital systems during a main power outage anyway.  If all systems were to go down, you've probably got a lot more to worry about I'd imagine.  




No they don't and yes the voice powers the phone.

http://www.thomasregister.com/olc/60186004/spcc1.htm

And they look like telephones too not just the headset types. I know, I was on Coast Guard ships and used them every day. No reason to replace what works. If the line gets severed just move to another hookup and you are back in communications.  Also another advantage is if the mouthpeice stops working you can use the earpiece to talk and listen moving it back and forth between mouth and ear and saying over when you are done talking so the person on the other side knows that they can now talk and you are listening, etc.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2003, 04:20:49 pm by Aldaron »

hobbesmaster

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #89 on: November 30, 2003, 04:42:03 pm »
Quote:

 Additinally, there was comment about how Adama had not allowed advanced Tech upgrades on the new Galactica, it should be noted that he isn't an admiral, and is supposed to be a "relic", why would he be allowed to dictate such a thing rather than having to follow orders and bring his ship in for upgrades




That didn't stop Kirk in ST:VI.  

Blyre

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #90 on: November 30, 2003, 04:47:39 pm »
Wanna go get me some batteries for the sound powered phones, Aldaron?

Wallace
 
P.S. I think they are referring to those other phones....

 

Aldaron

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #91 on: November 30, 2003, 05:50:22 pm »
Quote:

Wanna go get me some batteries for the sound powered phones, Aldaron?

Wallace
 
P.S. I think they are referring to those other phones....

   




LOL, never fell for that one or any of the others

Javora

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #92 on: November 30, 2003, 07:54:32 pm »
Quote:

Well, not sure where the rifled barrels are, but if they are on the Vipers, that could be because they are meant for atmospheric flight as well as space flight, so they would need to be accurate there.

I don't mind an updating of technology and stuff.  I always applaud using more realistic physics, that isn't what bothers me.  The combat and stuff looked cool in the stuff I saw, it's the other things that I found bothered me.  In several reviews they comment on #6's spine glowing when she's having sex.  Now how lame is that?  Not exactly something you would expect to see in modern sci-fi.  More akin to some of the old corny stuff that is unwatchable.  Doesn't Baltar notice?  I mean, really.  

I also agree on the reason for changing the sex of the characters.  I dont' mind changing Boomer that much.  He was a supporting character, but I must agree that the reasoning for changing Starbuck seems pretty flimsy.  If they really wanted to go through that male/female dynamic, there were characters from the old series that were female pilots after a while, and I wouldn't have any problem with that character being a capable pilot right from the get go and having a larger role.

I think my biggest problem with bullets in space is the amount of cargo space supplies would take up.  

Anyway, my biggest beef is with what's been done to the story overall, and the characters within.  I still look forward to watching it, but at this point, from what I've read, I think a different direction would have been better.  




I agree with most of that, but the shell rolling around on the floor of the Galactica looked way to big to be used on a Viper.  By the way did anyone notice that the person playing the new role of Boomer is Linda "Hoshi" Park little sister?
 

EmeraldEdge

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #93 on: November 30, 2003, 11:32:59 pm »
K, I wasn't aware of the voice powered phone, I only knew about the phones we all use everyday, which do require a current.  That voice powered phone was a good read, it is interesting that the range is 5 miles, which of course is more than enough to span the length of the Battlestar.  Do current naval vessels use these types of phones?  I only saw reference to using these phones in industrial plants, and for visitation phones in correctional facilities.  The funny thing is I read a thing talking about how BG wasn't going to go for a retro look.   Hmmm.

All this being said, I am going to give the show a chance, I do want to see it.  Heck, I gave Enterprise a chance, and have enjoyed it (for the most part, but some of it is pretty hard to stomach).  I happen to think it's the best crew overall since the original series, despite lazy writing and constantly repeated plots, but the way some of the Battlestar stuff looks parts are going to be a groaner at best.  Hopefully that won't happen.  When I first heard what actors were attached to it (Olmos and McDonnel) I was kind of excited.  But reading and seeing more and more has me worried.  Kind of like the build up to SFC3 and other things.  Some stuff sounded good, a little excitement, but the more that comes out the more frightening things look.  Anyway, we'll find out soon enough I guess.  

762

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #94 on: December 01, 2003, 10:08:01 am »
So let me get this straight...

1) Cylons were created by humans? Lame.   Hasn't that theme been utterly beaten to death?

2) The war has been going for a whole 40 years now? Wow!  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by 762 »

TalonClaw

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #95 on: December 01, 2003, 10:18:50 am »
It's not that they don't use electricity.  What they don't use is sophisticated computers.  Anything controlled by a computer chip can be reprogrammed and subject to attack.  That's why the new fighters failed.  The guidance system is used by the Cylons to shut down the fighters.  The Galactica is an old ship and doesn't have all that fancy computer tech.  Their fighters were the new ones though and are disabled.  Lucky they have some of the old style fighters in the museum hanger that still work and can not be shut down by the Cylons.

 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by TalonClaw »

CptCastrin

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #96 on: December 01, 2003, 12:38:11 pm »
Quote:

So let me get this straight...

1) Cylons were created by humans? Lame.   Hasn't that theme been utterly beaten to death?




Hasen't the whole "strange alien race has come to destroy us for no good reason other than they are ____ and we are human" plot device been beat to death too? I.e. the whole primis of Battlestar Galactica, the original series. In SciFi writing there is little that hasn't been done and been over and over and over again.

The current, popular, theme for scifi movies is the whole "technology run amuck" plot style as apposed to the "alien invasion" style but you can see examples of both curently. BSG is just using that instead of the original but both pretty much play the same in my book so it's a wash.

Quote:

2) The war has been going for a whole 40 years now? Wow!    




How long is long enough? WW2 lasted 6 years (roughly) and destroyed 2 countries, guted 2 others and changed the economic landscape for over 40 years. WW1 was only 4 years and did basically the same thing (though the effects were shorter or longer depending on ones opinion) in less time.

Using a ST/SFB comparison the General War lasted 14 years and ended only after all sides were exausted and there was little point in continuing.  

Or are you saying that 40 years is TOO long. On that I'd probably agree. I'm rather supprised to see 40 years as the length as in my mind there would be little left of industry or normal consumer goods and standard living condition levels would likely be low for the most part. 40 years of war would suck an economy dry, even a interstellar one IMHO.

   

Rat_Boy

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #97 on: December 01, 2003, 01:17:57 pm »
The Dominion War was only two yarns...er...years.  In my timeline, the War of Pacification was also two years or so, and the Andromedan Invasion is three years.

Death_Merchant

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #98 on: December 01, 2003, 01:41:27 pm »
I believe that complaint about a 40-50 year war in the miniseries is that it was 1000 yahrens in the original.  

762

  • Guest
Re: Another review of Galactica 2003
« Reply #99 on: December 01, 2003, 05:33:14 pm »
What DM said. The Lizards-making-robots-that-killed-them-and-now-want-to-kill-us schtick is at least a new twist on the alien conquest theme, which still has not been beaten to death as badly as the Blade Runner/Terminator/Matrix/insertyourfavorite60'sscifistoryhere theme.

The 1000 yahren history of the war may have seemed a little fantastic, but it gives you a yearning to learn more about the history of said war. Ditto the  Galactica itself, which has supposedly been around for 600 or so years herself.

40 years? Yawn.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by 762 »