Topic: SETI Thread Part III  (Read 204657 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

AJTK

  • Guest
Re: SETI @ Home passes 5 million members.
« Reply #260 on: June 03, 2004, 08:53:03 pm »
lol, i dont think i will be cranking out 1K wu's per DAY anytime soon, rofl! but, im hoping to build a new desktop sometime this year. either with a top o the line hyperlthreading enabled p4 or perhaps an athalon fx64

yeah, over 1000! FINALLY! and my time is still going down down down

HAND!  
 

IKV Nemesis D7L

  • Guest
Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
« Reply #261 on: June 06, 2004, 10:24:43 pm »
5) Dragon93     25000     33.455 years    11 hr 43 min 22.0 sec    Mon Jun 7 02:58:25 2004    United States  

Now lets see you get the 50,000 certificate.

 

Dragon93

  • Guest
Re: Dragon93 reaches 25000 WUs!
« Reply #262 on: June 09, 2004, 07:05:35 pm »
That's gonna be a while there buddy.

Unless I can commandeer some more machines...

The Postman

  • Guest
server troubles
« Reply #263 on: June 17, 2004, 11:03:24 am »
Does anybody know what is going on with the data server? Is this a bandwidth problem on their end? They seem hard pressed to get it to run 48 hours without problems.  I can't keep my "service" machines running if they can't keep the server up. As it is I haven't been able to transmit for 2 days on my home machines.  

IKV Nemesis D7L

  • Guest
Re: server troubles
« Reply #264 on: June 19, 2004, 09:32:25 am »
June 17, 2004
We are working on fixing the network problems that are resulting in dropped connections to the data server.

June 18, 2004
The campus network folks did some great troubleshooting and narrowed down the problem to a faulty link on the path to our ISP. Repairs have been called in.

I've had trouble sending in but since I use SETIQueue I haven't missed a WU.    

The Postman

  • Guest
Re: server troubles
« Reply #265 on: June 19, 2004, 03:41:13 pm »
I have been following their troubles since they began posting. My problem is that I have 3 machines that I can't run any caching on. Everytime the server crashes on their end and one of these 3 machines tries to transmit and can't, it stops running until I can reboot it. I lose more than half of my capacity when those machines don't run.  In the meantime I have enlarged my cache by 1 day for the rest of my machines.  

Taldren_Admin

  • Guest
SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #266 on: October 14, 2003, 12:24:59 pm »
And we're off....

Gambler

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #267 on: October 14, 2003, 12:31:39 pm »
Quote:

And we're off....  




And that is news to whom?  

 

Gambler

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #268 on: October 14, 2003, 12:33:47 pm »
Drat, if not for Farenheit, I would have had the last post in the second thread.  

DreadlordGW

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #269 on: October 14, 2003, 01:14:58 pm »
Ok everyone post away.

Gotta get this thread above the old ones

jualdeaux

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #270 on: October 14, 2003, 01:22:49 pm »
Heh. It seems that we can only get so many posts before this version of the UBB stops the thread from working well.

Sethan

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #271 on: October 14, 2003, 01:59:59 pm »
One of the last posts I made in Seti Thread II was a response from David Anderson - the power that be behind BOINC - to a note I sent him.

My original message was as follows:

Quote:

The ability of programs like SetiQueue to be a single point of contact for many Seti clients is important to maximum work unit production.  Many of the machines currently processing Seti work units do not have an internet connection, but connect to a single machine that does.

Remove the ability of SetiQueue to act as that single point of contact, and you also remove all of those non-internet connected machines from the pool.




His response:

 I think that an HTTP proxy would serve the same purpose.
I added some text to the "transition" page to this effect.
-- David  


The transition page of which he speaks is here:

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/boinc_transition_plan.html

and his address (should anyone have an issue with his response) is:

davea@ssl.berkeley.edu

Cyberkada

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #272 on: October 14, 2003, 02:46:32 pm »
Having said that non-Internet connected machines will not have access, I'm through after SETI I.  Most of my machines are behind a fairly ugly milnet firewall and have no access individually.  SETI is one of those banned Internet programs.  SETI can run but can not receive/ send W/Us.

Oh well, I guess I will have to be Lord God for Life for SETI I for Taldren.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Cyberkada »

Sethan

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #273 on: October 14, 2003, 03:04:17 pm »
Like I said - if you have an issue with it, send Mr. Anderson a note explaining what the issue is and why.

digi

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #274 on: October 14, 2003, 06:01:06 pm »
Although I only use 3 machines, 2 of these will be affected by Seti 2.  I've emailed Mr. Anderson about the issue as you suggested.  Hopefully if he gets enough of these some action may be taken to solve this issue.

IKV Nemesis D7L

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #275 on: October 14, 2003, 06:37:17 pm »
Programs like SetiQueue and SetiDriver were created to handle problems with non internet connected machines by individuals.  I would be very surprised if the same did not occur with BOINC.  So give it time.  

DreadlordGW

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #276 on: October 14, 2003, 06:42:50 pm »
This post brought to you buy the letter A

As in We need a BOINC Setiqueue

IKV Nemesis D7L

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #277 on: October 14, 2003, 07:10:00 pm »
Since it looks like the old threads are going to be "unstickied" I think it may be useful to post a link to them.  Here they are.

Link to Seti thread I
Link to Seti thread II  

Mentat Jon

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #278 on: October 14, 2003, 07:25:05 pm »
89) Mentat Jon   120 2530 hr 27 min 21 hr 05 min 13.5 sec Sat Sep 27 13:31:58 2003 United States



the slow creep to the summit continues!!!!  

jualdeaux

  • Guest
Re: SETI Thread Part III
« Reply #279 on: October 14, 2003, 08:33:30 pm »
Well, due to two factors, I'm going to stop running seti, at least until we get another group going on another project. Lately, I've been having trouble paying bills so I'm turning off everything non-essential to try to drive down my electric bill. The other is just that this part is ending and it looks like there will be a lull between this one and the next so this is a good time to quit.

I just can't believe how fear this relatively small group has gone. We went from nothing to one of the top 200 groups in the world in just a short time. Does anyone know how long this group has be in existence and how long the SETI project has been going?