Topic: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear  (Read 11101 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jim

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #80 on: October 19, 2003, 08:22:13 pm »
Hey guy, thanks again!  Excellent work!

Jim

Fluf

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #81 on: October 21, 2003, 12:18:29 pm »
Great work FS.  Now that SS2 is done, I will begin going over this list.

One thing though

 
Quote:

  F-SCS and H-MNV now have 20 fighters. (30 in SFB)
 




What happened to the Z-SCS.  This ship should have 12 fighters and 6 mech links from SFB- thus translating to 24 fighters following the 2/3rds rule.  Please take a look at this ship. Dizzy arcs need to go FAL/FAR following standard Mirak changes from previous list.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #82 on: October 21, 2003, 05:04:08 pm »
I think Maverick found a boo-boo . . .

http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB2&Number=195501&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

BTW, have the non-X MIRV ships been Play-tested at all?  

Rob Cole

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #83 on: October 21, 2003, 07:36:11 pm »
Quote:

I think Maverick found a boo-boo . . .

http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB2&Number=195501&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

BTW, have the non-X MIRV ships been Play-tested at all?  




Well I just killed a C-10K with one of the HWD's with MIRV's..In skrimmish mode at admiral level....it was easy.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #84 on: October 22, 2003, 12:59:30 am »
Quote:

I think Maverick found a boo-boo . . .

http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB2&Number=195501&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

BTW, have the non-X MIRV ships been Play-tested at all?  





I figured that if I made money off of this, I'd playtest it with selected players.
Oh, it's free?


I played with it with a couple of guys. The Miraks/Kzinti are now (except for a couple of errors) up to par to their real threat.

VelvetAcidChrist

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #85 on: October 22, 2003, 01:23:14 am »
well and i found a error in bpv translation -the ccx-m is 150+ bpv although the normal ccx is 230+ (sotrry i dont recall correct bpv) but instead of being 20 bpv higher its 100 bpv lower .

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #86 on: October 22, 2003, 08:58:14 am »
Quote:

well and i found a error in bpv translation -the ccx-m is 150+ bpv although the normal ccx is 230+ (sotrry i dont recall correct bpv) but instead of being 20 bpv higher its 100 bpv lower .  




thanks.
So, so far, it's the Z-DWDm and the Z-CCXm. The errors are starting to pile up.



BTW, mind using the error correction thread for this?

DH123

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #87 on: October 22, 2003, 09:22:24 am »
Quote:



I played with it with a couple of guys. The Miraks/Kzinti are now (except for a couple of errors) up to par to their real threat.  




Is this on an even BPV level that they are up to par?  I'm a D2 player where full-loadouts are the norm and what is balanced in an even-BPV GSA fight is rarely balanced in D2.  
« Last Edit: October 22, 2003, 09:23:14 am by DH123 »

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #88 on: October 22, 2003, 10:52:19 am »
Folks mainly focusing on D2 servers are always complaining about the shiplist. This is not a serious D2-oriented shiplist, even tho it could be used as such in a pinch.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #89 on: October 22, 2003, 11:44:29 am »
Quote:

Folks mainly focusing on D2 servers are always complaining about the shiplist. This is not a serious D2-oriented shiplist, even tho it could be used as such in a pinch.  




I guess you are right, we should stop trying to shove a square peg into a round hole.

Great for GSA though.   Once again, than you for all the hard work, it is appreciated.  

762

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #90 on: October 22, 2003, 12:29:18 pm »
Getting back to the Hydran fighters FS...

The issue is  that on GSA upgrading your fighters is not usually worth the money as it puts you against a bigger hull class.

Take the SUI for example. At 161 it's a decent ship even though the Killerbees will probably never leave the hangar. Bumping it to 167 makes it a real stretch. If you upgrade to useable fighters it has to go up against BCH's and light DN's. No way Jose.

OV, same thing, except you are then firmly in the DN range.

Gone are the days when the Hydrans had a relatively inexpensive fighter we could upgrade to. The cheapest useable fighter is now the Yellowjacket-II which is just pricey enough to put the mothership out of competition with what it will be facing.

(In the olden days we had a 2-hellbore Hornet-I, which was a bit OTT at its price. Unfortunately it was over-nerfed by getting both a price bump AND removing one of the hellbores. Oddly enough it was made the same price as the Yellow-II which is faster, carries a gatling, and has the same hitpoints.)

There are a few ships on the list worth upgrading fighters for but in the 160-200 range the 2 BPV Killerbee really hurts.

DH123

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #91 on: October 22, 2003, 01:56:49 pm »
Quote:

Getting back to the Hydran fighters FS...

The issue is  that on GSA upgrading your fighters is not usually worth the money as it puts you against a bigger hull class.

Take the SUI for example. At 161 it's a decent ship even though the Killerbees will probably never leave the hangar. Bumping it to 167 makes it a real stretch. If you upgrade to useable fighters it has to go up against BCH's and light DN's. No way Jose.

OV, same thing, except you are then firmly in the DN range.

Gone are the days when the Hydrans had a relatively inexpensive fighter we could upgrade to. The cheapest useable fighter is now the Yellowjacket-II which is just pricey enough to put the mothership out of competition with what it will be facing.

(In the olden days we had a 2-hellbore Hornet-I, which was a bit OTT at its price. Unfortunately it was over-nerfed by getting both a price bump AND removing one of the hellbores. Oddly enough it was made the same price as the Yellow-II which is faster, carries a gatling, and has the same hitpoints.)

There are a few ships on the list worth upgrading fighters for but in the 160-200 range the 2 BPV Killerbee really hurts.  




Could this be solved by making Admin Shuttles the default fighters?  

Corbomite

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #92 on: October 22, 2003, 01:58:25 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Getting back to the Hydran fighters FS...

The issue is  that on GSA upgrading your fighters is not usually worth the money as it puts you against a bigger hull class.

Take the SUI for example. At 161 it's a decent ship even though the Killerbees will probably never leave the hangar. Bumping it to 167 makes it a real stretch. If you upgrade to useable fighters it has to go up against BCH's and light DN's. No way Jose.

OV, same thing, except you are then firmly in the DN range.

Gone are the days when the Hydrans had a relatively inexpensive fighter we could upgrade to. The cheapest useable fighter is now the Yellowjacket-II which is just pricey enough to put the mothership out of competition with what it will be facing.

(In the olden days we had a 2-hellbore Hornet-I, which was a bit OTT at its price. Unfortunately it was over-nerfed by getting both a price bump AND removing one of the hellbores. Oddly enough it was made the same price as the Yellow-II which is faster, carries a gatling, and has the same hitpoints.)

There are a few ships on the list worth upgrading fighters for but in the 160-200 range the 2 BPV Killerbee really hurts.  




Could this be solved by making Admin Shuttles the default fighters?  




No.

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #93 on: October 22, 2003, 02:07:48 pm »
Quote:

Getting back to the Hydran fighters FS...

The issue is  that on GSA upgrading your fighters is not usually worth the money as it puts you against a bigger hull class.

Take the SUI for example. At 161 it's a decent ship even though the Killerbees will probably never leave the hangar. Bumping it to 167 makes it a real stretch. If you upgrade to useable fighters it has to go up against BCH's and light DN's. No way Jose.

OV, same thing, except you are then firmly in the DN range.

Gone are the days when the Hydrans had a relatively inexpensive fighter we could upgrade to. The cheapest useable fighter is now the Yellowjacket-II which is just pricey enough to put the mothership out of competition with what it will be facing.

(In the olden days we had a 2-hellbore Hornet-I, which was a bit OTT at its price. Unfortunately it was over-nerfed by getting both a price bump AND removing one of the hellbores. Oddly enough it was made the same price as the Yellow-II which is faster, carries a gatling, and has the same hitpoints.)

There are a few ships on the list worth upgrading fighters for but in the 160-200 range the 2 BPV Killerbee really hurts.  





It doesn't change the fact that BPV represents how well a ship fights.. not how much a ship costs. Sure, stock Hydrans will have a harder time, but upgrading them will cost less, and it comes out to the same. If anything, I've leveled the playing field.

762

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #94 on: October 22, 2003, 09:49:31 pm »
Didn't really read my post I see.  

It DOES NOT come out the same because NOT ALL HYDRAN SHIPS ARE WORTH UPGRADING ON GSA.

Try flying Hydran at 200 late and see what I mean !!!!

Strafer

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #95 on: October 22, 2003, 11:15:35 pm »
Are you saying you'll be flying Hydran Late 200 with stock KillerBees.I? Cuz that's the only thing that makes sense.
 

762

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #96 on: October 22, 2003, 11:46:46 pm »
165
170
175
190
195
200
...probably a lot more I'm not thinking of

Any of those will be flown with at least one group of stock Killerbees, which now costs you an extra 3-6 BPV for the priviledge.

Why? Because the cheapest fighter worth upgrading to costs 4 BPV per fighter, and YOU CAN'T ALWAYS AFFORD IT.

165 is totally fubared - both the SUI and CHC are now priced right out of it.

Why don't you go add 3-6 BPV to each ship in the Fed list and see how they react?????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by 762 »

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #97 on: October 23, 2003, 04:20:00 am »
I stand behind my changes. However, there's a solution that could be applied to Hydrans, since they are unique in this case.

Hydrans have fighters, but these fighters are not optional. Why not? Why not make versions of casual carriers without fighters? 100% SFB legal, and would open up the choices in Hydrans where BPV is involved. This is like saying that Lyrans MUST buy their PFs.
Note: Hydran  Full Carriers wouldn't get this new variant with this solution. Hydran DNs are usually full carriers, each and every time, so they are exempt too.

For example, the current H-SUI has 6 fighters and costs 167 BPV. A "H-SUIn" would have 0 fighters, and cost 155.



Remember: BPV is how well a ship fights, not how much it costs to build. There's no reason why the Hydran stock fighters which are identical to all other stock fighters should cost less. However, I don't have a problem in removing forced BPV costs for something that is usually optional in SFB.

-- Luc

762

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #98 on: October 23, 2003, 08:34:54 am »
An even better solution!

Will we see this in OP+ 3.2?

FireSoul

  • Guest
Re: OP+ 3.1 -- Ready for the world to fear
« Reply #99 on: October 23, 2003, 01:01:08 pm »
Quote:

An even better solution!

Will we see this in OP+ 3.2?  




Probably. I haven't had the urge to work on any 3.2 version yet.