Topic: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie  (Read 2576 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Atrahasis

  • Guest
The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« on: August 08, 2003, 08:00:14 am »
I've never seen the actual CD but only a pic from it, but there is one diagram from The Captain's Chair that says the TOS Constitution has AFT torpedo tube(s) coming from that deck below the clamshell hangar doors, as well as phasers if I recall correctly.

What do you all say, yay or nay?

Things to consider: That ship really needs aft weapons. Even in Klingon Academy it has aft phasers at least.

The NX-01 has aft weapons. If the Connie doesn't have any that would've been just downright inane.  

sandman69247

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2003, 11:44:03 am »
I agree...the Connie should have aft weapons, at least a couple of phasers and a torp tube or 2. I mean, even in TOS,. the Enterprise is supposed to be the best the fleet has produced, but a rear vulnerable ship wouldn't fit that.

 

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2003, 01:15:29 pm »
Quote:

I agree...the Connie should have aft weapons, at least a couple of phasers and a torp tube or 2. I mean, even in TOS,. the Enterprise is supposed to be the best the fleet has produced, but a rear vulnerable ship wouldn't fit that.

 




There is no need for RA weapons when you dont turn tail....They didnt need rear arcs till TNG...hehe

sandman69247

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2003, 01:21:58 pm »
But they're not for turning tail...they're for those sneak attacks in the back that those Klinks and Roms are so proud of lol.

 

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2003, 01:27:07 pm »
Quote:

But they're not for turning tail...they're for those sneak attacks in the back that those Klinks and Roms are so proud of lol.

 




IIRC..Kirk was only surrounded one time....by rommies....on purpose...to steal a cloaking device...and he still didnt need any stinking RA's....heh heh

NannerSlug

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2003, 02:30:20 pm »
if you want to make a model for a connie that has an aft tube, go for it.

i do think that the actual model has aft phaser spots above the hangar, but i havent seen the aft tube on the real model before.

ChrisJohnson

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2003, 04:18:12 pm »
Quote:

I've never seen the actual CD but only a pic from it, but there is one diagram from The Captain's Chair that says the TOS Constitution has AFT torpedo tube(s) coming from that deck below the clamshell hangar doors, as well as phasers if I recall correctly.

What do you all say, yay or nay?

Things to consider: That ship really needs aft weapons. Even in Klingon Academy it has aft phasers at least.

The NX-01 has aft weapons. If the Connie doesn't have any that would've been just downright inane.  




Actually I consider the NX-01 to be a ship of an Alternate Universe... Too many inconsistancies...

And the Connie refit (aka "Enterprise-class") has aft phasers in all the movies it was featured in, but they were never seen used... But they're there.  The people who made KA recognized that and slapped 'em onto their Connie refit model... (Geez... I gotta find my KA CDs.... You make me want to play 'em again. *sigh* I miss having fun with the game like I do playing Dynaverse II online...)

ChrisJohnson

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2003, 04:19:51 pm »
There's also a non-canon reference of the Big E before her refit firing aft Photorps one time... I read about it on a TOS novel, "Assignment: Eternity"... A great novel that focuses on Gary Seven.

manitoba

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2003, 04:26:18 pm »
yes she did have both aft weapons 1 aft torp and 2 aft phasers just cant remembers where i seen it  

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #9 on: August 08, 2003, 05:04:39 pm »
Hello Atrahasis,

Yep,
In my opinion, you are right,
such modifications would be well waranted,

Aft phaser banks most certainly would have been installed,
I believe,

Anyways,
My two-cents,


Quote:

I've never seen the actual CD but only a pic from it, but there is one diagram from The Captain's Chair that says the TOS Constitution has AFT torpedo tube(s) coming from that deck below the clamshell hangar doors, as well as phasers if I recall correctly.

What do you all say, yay or nay?

Things to consider: That ship really needs aft weapons. Even in Klingon Academy it has aft phasers at least.

The NX-01 has aft weapons. If the Connie doesn't have any that would've been just downright inane.  





Take care,
GeneralWolfe

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #10 on: August 08, 2003, 07:41:02 pm »
In SFB she was refitted as were most of the other ships including other races empires ships  to have rear defenses. Not devastating. Just enough to discourage tailgaters.

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2003, 02:29:06 am »
They may not have needed aft weapons in tng, but they were clearly visable. And picard did use aft torpedoes a couple times. Voyager used aft phasers. The TMP constitution had 2 turrets clearly visable. It is only logical To assume the tos had some as well. Heck, even the Vorcha class has rear banks. I wouldn't doubt the ktinga and thus D7 also have some form of aft energy weapon atleast.

James Formo

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2003, 04:27:36 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

But they're not for turning tail...they're for those sneak attacks in the back that those Klinks and Roms are so proud of lol.

 




IIRC..Kirk was only surrounded one time....by rommies....on purpose...to steal a cloaking device...and he still didnt need any stinking RA's....heh heh  




Ok I remember that episode. Then why is it that years later the Feds still do not have a clock device when Scotty was able to Cloak the enterprise to get away from the Rommies. This never made any sense to me. In fact I find it quite an annoying tidbit. The enterprise is was a CA class, surely they could have massed produced there own cloak based off the one Kirk stole and at least fitted it an frigates for spying.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2003, 04:53:31 pm »
Hello James,

Yep,
I agree, that always bugged me too,

For some reason,
The Feds signed the Treaty of Algeron with the Romulan Empire,
in it the Feds promised NOT to develop "cloaking technology",

In my opinion,
I have never really heard a convincing reason why the Feds would have said,
"Ok, no Cloaks"  

Here is a ST: TNG link

The Pegasus
TNG #
[ Ooops site down, I''ll put it in later]

PS, It always seemed like a really bone-head treaty,


Take care,
GeneralWolfe
 

Capt. Sarmox

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #14 on: August 09, 2003, 05:59:45 pm »
The real life reason I've read for no UFP cloaks is that Roddenberry felt it went against Starfleet role as peaceful explorers to be sneaking around. Never mind that cloaks would help immensely in surveying highly advanced but still pre-warp cultures.

One thing to note is that the blueprints done by David Kimble and releases around the time of TMP list the refit Enterprise as having a cloak. While we never saw the UFP use them in the movies, it's possible Starfleet fielded cloak capable ships between @2270 and the signing of the Treaty of Algeron in 2311. I wonder if the Tomed incident which lead to the treaty and a long period of Romulan isolation had something to do with Starfleet's use or development of advanced cloaking technology?  

manitoba

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #15 on: August 09, 2003, 06:24:50 pm »
i do remember a TNG episode where a facility was cloaked to keep an eye on a civilization once. granted it was a planet observation post post but it was a cloaked federation one

Grav

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #16 on: August 09, 2003, 06:30:26 pm »
wasnt that a film Insurrection i think (but the thing wasnt cloaked was it, it had like a hologram at the entrance)

Bernard Guignard

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2003, 05:52:16 am »
A tos Constitution class with Aft firing torpedo it would be a nice variant and there's already a Tmp version from Ships of the Starfleet in the USS America. I like the Idea.

     

MajorRacal

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2003, 05:07:08 am »
I'm sure the FASA sourcbooks listed one of the TMP Constitution/Enterprise (Mk III, I think it was) with aft phasers and a single aft torpedo, although I personally couldn't see a suitable hardpoint for them... I'd imagine a photon bay could be fitted  under the shuttle bay, but both that and any phasers would probably  have terribly limited fields of fire because of the warp pylon/nacelle configuration - of course that could just be me...

MajorRacal  

Atrahasis

  • Guest
Re: The Captain's Chair CD: your opinion of the Connie
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2003, 06:08:30 am »
Quote:

The real life reason I've read for no UFP cloaks is that Roddenberry felt it went against Starfleet role as peaceful explorers to be sneaking around. Never mind that cloaks would help immensely in surveying highly advanced but still pre-warp cultures.

One thing to note is that the blueprints done by David Kimble and releases around the time of TMP list the refit Enterprise as having a cloak. While we never saw the UFP use them in the movies, it's possible Starfleet fielded cloak capable ships between @2270 and the signing of the Treaty of Algeron in 2311. I wonder if the Tomed incident which lead to the treaty and a long period of Romulan isolation had something to do with Starfleet's use or development of advanced cloaking technology?  




Yes, a very interesting and plausible hypothesis. There was indeed an window of about 40 years where Fed ships could very well have had cloaks in the TMP era without breaking any treaties. Good observation!