Topic: Die Hard Re-banned  (Read 71476 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ChrsLWlstr

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #480 on: February 10, 2003, 05:00:45 pm »
<Errr..... Bump>

 

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #481 on: February 10, 2003, 05:37:26 pm »
What I said WB was that I will make an acception for him in game play, you on the other hand imply I am an idiot of some sort.

My verbage is somewhat less than foul I suspect, only sightly harsh.

Now should I be "lucky" enough to meet you on a server, I will glady withdraw and give you the win, being as I would rather have my hands cut off rather then waste the effort playing you.

Hooch  

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #482 on: February 10, 2003, 05:46:39 pm »
I find it odd that your comments are directed at me and me me only.

Are you afraid to make comment to Chutt-Ritt and the others that support this thread?

Or do you feel that you are my better and can thereby make your remarks to what you consider to be an unter mann and a military hack?

Concerning the the SSCF server. It stated "have fun, play with honor, no foul language, and be respectful. To your modest credit, you passed the first three but sadly lack the last one.

Also, the issue here is the banned people not me, although you seemed to be determined to make it me.

Anyway, please keep on posting sir. Every time you do I get closer to the 5000 views I am currently shooting for.  

Hooch

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #483 on: February 10, 2003, 05:53:19 pm »
Quote:

I find it odd that your comments are directed at me and me me only.

Are you afraid to make comment to Chutt-Ritt and the others that support this thread?

Or do you feel that you are my better and can thereby make your remarks to what you consider to be an unter mann and a military hack?

Concerning the the SSCF server. It stated "have fun, play with honor, no foul language, and be respectful. To your modest credit, you passed the first three but sadly lack the last one.

Also, the issue here is the banned people not me, although you seemed to be determined to make it me.

Anyway, please keep on posting sir. Every time you do I get closer to the 5000 views I am currently shooting for.  

Hooch  




I think we covered the "Hooch" issues for today.

But, lest you forget, I have been petitioning for DH's freedom also.

<bump>

Free Die Hard!!



 

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #484 on: February 10, 2003, 05:58:14 pm »
Dear WB

Oh drat, I was so looking foward to a retort.

Question, if you are in support of this then why for goodness sake to you make ratty remarks at me? Do you like my ratty ones that come back? Or are you just looking for some cheap yayas?

Hooch

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #485 on: February 10, 2003, 06:04:47 pm »
You were talking about "being respectful".

Do you really think calling people a "creep" is "being respectful"?  I think you are better than that

I just did not appreciate the name-calling. If he started vulgar mouthing off and such, then I guess ya gotta do what ya gotta do. But, all he did was reference a post that DH should have deleted by now.

oh yeah, <bump> and DH delete that post!!  

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #486 on: February 10, 2003, 06:15:25 pm »
You kidding right? "Creep" was the least of the things i wished to call him for abusing his access to the 2.net forums so he could dump a little more p**p on DH.

Hooch

DrSchreber

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #487 on: February 10, 2003, 06:35:23 pm »
Quote:

Now please read slowly, I have no intention of letting this thread die. If I get deployed to the gulf soon I bet that somebody else will keep it going until I get back.

Mocking me in your current manner only motivates me all the more.

Hooch    





To All,

Regarding not letting it die.......

Semper Fi!   Hoorah!

DrSchreber

 

Toasty0

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #488 on: February 10, 2003, 07:51:35 pm »
Quote:

int iThreadAirSupply = 200;

for (i = 0; i < INFINITY; i++)  {

if (iBannedRemoved == TRUE)  {
doToldYaSoHaHa();
break;
}

switch (Forum_Resp) {

case NO_RESP:
printf("bump\n");
break;

case ALT_CRITICISM:
doWittySubleLists();
doPushOwnDirtUnderRug();
doNameCallling();
doIntimidationThreats();
break;

}

PlayYouCantAlwaysGetWantYouWant(Hooch);
iThreadAirSupply -= 1;

}  // end for INFINITY ever

printf("Purgatory Jail Break\n");    





Brahahaha. That is a fine piece of humor. Anyone who doesn't get it is most likely suffering a serious lack of bran in their diet.    

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #489 on: February 10, 2003, 08:14:11 pm »
Quote:

You kidding right? "Creep" was the least of the things i wished to call him for abusing his access to the 2.net forums so he could dump a little more p**p on DH.

Hooch  




I could not care less what your issues are with him on the SFC2.net Forums.  Just keep it civil here if he keeps it civil here, and I believe all will work out nicely for you in the end.

I think people that don't "fall" for the low road temptation of the flamer, come off with their opinion more respected and adhered to in the end.
 
 Something about "being respectful".  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Karnak »

Toasty0

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #490 on: February 10, 2003, 08:41:18 pm »
Hooch wrote:

Quote:

Well, I am a nice shade of pink right now.

DH was not right to say that for sure, It was very poor taste to say what he did.




So, is there any reasonable reason that you feel you should continue supporting the reversal of his banishment from these forums?

Hooch continued to post:
Quote:


CD, I normally allow folks to leave a fight with me if they are beaten, but you I will may a special catagory for if I ever find you on a sever.




I'm not sure why you're upset here, but if you are it begs the question: Do you feel that CD should have continued to have allowed some folks to misrepresent MD as anything more than a poster of hate-filled and vitrolic posts?
Quote:



Hooch

Also please note the comment by DH was made AFTER they banned him again for nothing, oddy CD did not bother to explain that, he only wished to add a fuel to this fire. Cheap shot you creep!
 
   




Do you sincerely feel that the time frame of when he posted that tripe is of any justification for such a vile commentary?

Have you considered that maybe you have gotten so wrapped up in your crusade that you have lost sight of more important areas of conduct?

Well, some food for thought.

       

Hale

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #491 on: February 10, 2003, 09:26:34 pm »
Quote:

int iThreadAirSupply = 200;

for (i = 0; i < INFINITY; i++)  {

if (iBannedRemoved == TRUE)  {
doToldYaSoHaHa();
break;
}

switch (Forum_Resp) {

case NO_RESP:
printf("bump\n");
break;

case ALT_CRITICISM:
doWittySubleLists();
doPushOwnDirtUnderRug();
doNameCallling();
doIntimidationThreats();
break;

}

PlayYouCantAlwaysGetWantYouWant(Hooch);
iThreadAirSupply -= 1;

}  // end for INFINITY ever

printf("Purgatory Jail Break\n");    








Please line your braces up!!  I dislike looking at code where the open braces trail the line.  :P  

Karnak

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #492 on: February 10, 2003, 09:41:32 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

int iThreadAirSupply = 200;

for (i = 0; i < INFINITY; i++)  {

if (iBannedRemoved == TRUE)  {
doToldYaSoHaHa();
break;
}

switch (Forum_Resp) {

case NO_RESP:
printf("bump\n");
break;

case ALT_CRITICISM:
doWittySubleLists();
doPushOwnDirtUnderRug();
doNameCallling();
doIntimidationThreats();
break;

}

PlayYouCantAlwaysGetWantYouWant(Hooch);
iThreadAirSupply -= 1;

}  // end for INFINITY ever

printf("Purgatory Jail Break\n");    








Please line your braces up!!  I dislike looking at code where the open braces trail the line.  :P  




LOL,  I tried using tabs and spaces but they don't make it when the final post is submitted.  

SSCF Hooch

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #493 on: February 10, 2003, 09:47:42 pm »
[quoteYour bossy tone could use a little work too.  I think you will find people a little more receptive to your views, if you don't treat them like something to be ordered around whenever you so please.  
Read this very slowly: This aint the military here and you are not a GFL member so don't try it with me ever.

You can treat people however you want in the Air Force here or in the Gulf. Try the bossy and self-righteous talk here and you will be continually be causing yourself grief. Something about "being respectful".  




Sorry twenty years is a bit of a hard habit to break. Twenty years of "being there" to make sure people have the right to speak their veiws. I have put my money where my mouth is and raised my right hand 4 times to say I will and swear to go where sent so people can live and speak freely.

Civil? I am civil to a fault. You must not read much else on these forums or I would see you commenting on other peoples civility along with my own. You are inconsistant in your oberservations and your posts. You attack and mock the cry foul when you recieve it back and then step up on a soap box and preach the virtues of respect and civilty when you have it served back to you in kind.

I did not start this with you, you began it, and you continue it.

I rather fancy GFL is a very good organization and I respect it and it's gamers. (with one exception of course)

Grief? Here? You have got to be kidding, this is child's play. Jumping in holes at 02:00 when a klaxton goes off because 4 Scuds have been launched at your base is grief. Pulling on CWE gear is grief and lugging an M16 around with you is grief.

Bah, your not even worth the effort.  

Kroma_BaSyl

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #494 on: February 10, 2003, 10:16:19 pm »
OK girls. Cut it out.

Stormbringer

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #495 on: February 10, 2003, 10:18:05 pm »
20 minus 475 days and counting.

KATChuutRitt

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #496 on: February 11, 2003, 12:27:52 am »
Oh my,

Hooch, Karnak come over here so I can whop you both of your heads and knock some sense into yas.......

Hooch,    

 I agree tha CD took Die Hards post out of the proper time line.   But that is no reason to bash him for using the post to support his argument, that is his right, and we shouldn't get upset by it.    I just wish that the time frame be considered regarding this.

 As you said, with regard to that remark,  you do not condone it, neither do I, but like others have posted I understand the frustration he must feel at the initial banning.  If your boss fires you due to a misunderstanding, and you cuss him out for it, once he comes to realize he was mistaken in his initial assumption, he should still hire you back.  That why we continue to support Die Hard, although I feel he should delete that 1 remark (it really isn't kosher) as I posted long ago on that very thread.

I can understand Karnak's defense of CD, and I feel he was correct in this,  so dont get so upset by it. Whatever the cause the fact is the two of you got a little heated and started flaming, well stop it and get on with the purpose at hand.  Flame wars are not what we are here for.



Karnak,    

If you believe in the un-banning cause as you say you do, it is counterproductive to tell Hooch it is a "lost cause" as your post implied.  In this matter I support Hooch 100%.  A "lost cause" is worth fighting for when it is just (and not sure that it is a lost one myself).  Die Hard's continued anger over the banning is not unlike your own over the AOTK issues, but if you will kindly recall, I still went to bat for your return to the campaign as a valued player and community member despite your venomous responses after the incident of your removal as ARM.  Later you did admit to a certain unjustness,and render an apology about your negetive responses as I hope Die Hard will do if his situation is corrected.  I hope this may prove to be the case and that he will follow that example.  Some called the AOTK " Karnak situation"  a "lost cause" but it proved worth the effort, as you validated my efforts on your behalf.  So don't let it arise again.

I also ask you to remember that Fluf and I were  SFC2.net  RM and A/RM respectively, and we did our best towards you, so please do not direct criticism towards the SFC2.net RMs without considering this.

I agree in your defence of CD and his rights to disagree, but I think I detected some holdover venom from the AOTK issue, this likely triggered Hooch's response,  please let it drop.



Well, either 2 things can happen here, #1 you both give an apology for letting this misunderstanding become a minor Flame, and your heated words, and shake hands, or #2 you both start flaming me for playing peace broker or misunderstanding the issues at hand.  I hope you both are men enough to do the former without a "him first attitude".  If you can do this, I will hold you both in higher regard.  ...........

Now lets get on with it and Bump this sucker!!!!!

my 2 cents plus tax.........
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by KATChuutRitt »

KATChuutRitt

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #497 on: February 11, 2003, 12:29:55 am »
 
Quote:

 Will Chuut get himself banned?
- J'inn




Well J'inn thats what you are here for, to keep me from going too far  

Honestly I don't think I have to this point.  I have been a nuisance perhaps to those who wish to sweep this banning thing under the rug, but I have refrained from any use of profanity and any personal attacks on this forum.  If disagreeing with Taldren's banning policy and disagreeing with those who support it is out of line, well I guess I'm a case of banned waiting to happen.  

But let me say this right now, I don't think anyone in the other camp is a moron or a bad person, I just think that they should rethink their views on this particular issue, and suggest that they may have lost some perspective.  They may feel the same about me and I will not be angered by them if they do.  That is what I am defending after all, the right to disagree.

Oh yeah, almost forgot,

  BUMP !!!    
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by KATChuutRitt »

CD_NT

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #498 on: February 11, 2003, 02:35:11 am »
Quote:

You kidding right? "Creep" was the least of the things i wished to call him for abusing his access to the 2.net forums so he could dump a little more p**p on DH.

Hooch  




The man wishes for the death of another persons children
and I'm the bad guy here? That's classic. I make post showing
people what Die Hard is like and I get insulted and called
names. Gimme a break.

I didn't abuse any access to the SFC2.Net forums. I didn't
have to make an account. I didn't have to register. I didn't
have to log on. I didn't have to use a password. The post
was right there in the "General Forum" for anyone to see.

I stumbled upon the SFC2.Net forums because of a link
someone posted here for a thread there called "101 Uses
for SFC3". Speaking of that thread, let's share DH's answer
to that topic:

Die Hard: " #2 Proof the Dave Ferrel is a moron!"

I'm a little unclear on how this is a use for SFC3 but I think
people get the point.

Well, since you are already calling me names, I might as well
post the other two nuggets of DH wisdom that I came across.

In a thread titled "Another Shining Moment In Taldren's History"
with a survey asking if Dave has "lost it"

Die Hard:" I think my opinions on the pig-F'er are well known."

This doesn't sound to good, unless pig-F'er is a code word
for "swell dude".

The last example I found was probaly made when he was
banned the first time. Since he was under undo stress from
the experience we won't hold it against him but let's share it
any ways.

Die Hard: "David Ferrell is a real smuck. Not only has he
banned me 3 times what stuff that was really minor,
he's started deleting individual posts of mine.
He can kiss my tucus before I say I'm sorry and mean it.
I posted a half-hearted apology to this moron, but thats all
he's gonna get. Besides, HE CANNOT KEEP ME OUT!!!!!!!!!
MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Take care Mr. Hooch. Talk to you soon.
 

Pirate

  • Guest
Re: Die Hard Re-banned
« Reply #499 on: February 11, 2003, 02:58:19 am »
Just my Daily bump