Topic: Die Hard Re-banned (Read 72488 times)

hobbesmaster · « **Reply #220 on:** February 10, 2003, 04:19:10 pm »

Quote:

Will J'inn ever get back to work and quit wasting time on the forums?

No.

Keep this as the first thread and Taldren can't possibly ignore it! Oh well...

Quick question: Who did the bannings? Is this person currently doing moderating on the forum? Has this person been known to say things on the forum that Taldren later had to formally withdraw? If so, does that mean that this moderator is competant to make the decision to ban instrumental members of the D2 community?

Ok, the last sentence was directly refering to the Hydran RM, so ban me..

Tantalus · « **Reply #222 on:** February 10, 2003, 04:33:14 pm »

<barges into the creche>

Unban the banned!! And get some lolly pops in here! :P

ChrsLWlstr · « **Reply #223 on:** February 10, 2003, 05:00:45 pm »

<Errr..... Bump>

SSCF Hooch · « **Reply #224 on:** February 10, 2003, 05:37:26 pm »

What I said WB was that I will make an acception for him in game play, you on the other hand imply I am an idiot of some sort.

My verbage is somewhat less than foul I suspect, only sightly harsh.

Now should I be "lucky" enough to meet you on a server, I will glady withdraw and give you the win, being as I would rather have my hands cut off rather then waste the effort playing you.

Hooch

SSCF Hooch · « **Reply #225 on:** February 10, 2003, 05:46:39 pm »

I find it odd that your comments are directed at me and me me only.

Are you afraid to make comment to Chutt-Ritt and the others that support this thread?

Or do you feel that you are my better and can thereby make your remarks to what you consider to be an unter mann and a military hack?

Concerning the the SSCF server. It stated "have fun, play with honor, no foul language, and be respectful. To your modest credit, you passed the first three but sadly lack the last one.

Also, the issue here is the banned people not me, although you seemed to be determined to make it me.

Anyway, please keep on posting sir. Every time you do I get closer to the 5000 views I am currently shooting for.

Hooch

SSCF Hooch · « **Reply #227 on:** February 10, 2003, 05:58:14 pm »

Dear WB

Oh drat, I was so looking foward to a retort.

Question, if you are in support of this then why for goodness sake to you make ratty remarks at me? Do you like my ratty ones that come back? Or are you just looking for some cheap yayas?

Hooch

Karnak · « **Reply #228 on:** February 10, 2003, 06:04:47 pm »

You were talking about "being respectful".

Do you really think calling people a "creep" is "being respectful"? I think you are better than that

I just did not appreciate the name-calling. If he started vulgar mouthing off and such, then I guess ya gotta do what ya gotta do. But, all he did was reference a post that DH should have deleted by now.

oh yeah, <bump> and DH delete that post!!

SSCF Hooch · « **Reply #229 on:** February 10, 2003, 06:15:25 pm »

You kidding right? "Creep" was the least of the things i wished to call him for abusing his access to the 2.net forums so he could dump a little more p**p on DH.

Hooch

Toasty0 · « **Reply #233 on:** February 10, 2003, 08:41:18 pm »

Hooch wrote:

Quote:

Well, I am a nice shade of pink right now.

DH was not right to say that for sure, It was very poor taste to say what he did.

So, is there any reasonable reason that you feel you should continue supporting the reversal of his banishment from these forums?

Hooch continued to post:

Quote:

CD, I normally allow folks to leave a fight with me if they are beaten, but you I will may a special catagory for if I ever find you on a sever.

I'm not sure why you're upset here, but if you are it begs the question: Do you feel that CD should have continued to have allowed some folks to misrepresent MD as anything more than a poster of hate-filled and vitrolic posts?

Quote:

Hooch

Also please note the comment by DH was made AFTER they banned him again for nothing, oddy CD did not bother to explain that, he only wished to add a fuel to this fire. Cheap shot you creep!

Do you sincerely feel that the time frame of when he posted that tripe is of any justification for such a vile commentary?

Have you considered that maybe you have gotten so wrapped up in your crusade that you have lost sight of more important areas of conduct?

Well, some food for thought.

SSCF Hooch · « **Reply #236 on:** February 10, 2003, 09:47:42 pm »

[quoteYour bossy tone could use a little work too. I think you will find people a little more receptive to your views, if you don't treat them like something to be ordered around whenever you so please.
Read this very slowly: This aint the military here and you are not a GFL member so don't try it with me ever.

You can treat people however you want in the Air Force here or in the Gulf. Try the bossy and self-righteous talk here and you will be continually be causing yourself grief. Something about "being respectful".

Sorry twenty years is a bit of a hard habit to break. Twenty years of "being there" to make sure people have the right to speak their veiws. I have put my money where my mouth is and raised my right hand 4 times to say I will and swear to go where sent so people can live and speak freely.

Civil? I am civil to a fault. You must not read much else on these forums or I would see you commenting on other peoples civility along with my own. You are inconsistant in your oberservations and your posts. You attack and mock the cry foul when you recieve it back and then step up on a soap box and preach the virtues of respect and civilty when you have it served back to you in kind.

I did not start this with you, you began it, and you continue it.

I rather fancy GFL is a very good organization and I respect it and it's gamers. (with one exception of course)

Grief? Here? You have got to be kidding, this is child's play. Jumping in holes at 02:00 when a klaxton goes off because 4 Scuds have been launched at your base is grief. Pulling on CWE gear is grief and lugging an M16 around with you is grief.

Bah, your not even worth the effort.

Kroma_BaSyl · « **Reply #237 on:** February 10, 2003, 10:16:19 pm »

OK girls. Cut it out.

Stormbringer · « **Reply #238 on:** February 10, 2003, 10:18:05 pm »

20 minus 475 days and counting.

KATChuutRitt · « **Reply #239 on:** February 11, 2003, 12:27:52 am »

Oh my,

Hooch, Karnak come over here so I can whop you both of your heads and knock some sense into yas.......

Hooch,

I agree tha CD took Die Hards post out of the proper time line. But that is no reason to bash him for using the post to support his argument, that is his right, and we shouldn't get upset by it. I just wish that the time frame be considered regarding this.

As you said, with regard to that remark, you do not condone it, neither do I, but like others have posted I understand the frustration he must feel at the initial banning. If your boss fires you due to a misunderstanding, and you cuss him out for it, once he comes to realize he was mistaken in his initial assumption, he should still hire you back. That why we continue to support Die Hard, although I feel he should delete that 1 remark (it really isn't kosher) as I posted long ago on that very thread.

I can understand Karnak's defense of CD, and I feel he was correct in this, so dont get so upset by it. Whatever the cause the fact is the two of you got a little heated and started flaming, well stop it and get on with the purpose at hand. Flame wars are not what we are here for.

Karnak,

If you believe in the un-banning cause as you say you do, it is counterproductive to tell Hooch it is a "lost cause" as your post implied. In this matter I support Hooch 100%. A "lost cause" is worth fighting for when it is just (and not sure that it is a lost one myself). Die Hard's continued anger over the banning is not unlike your own over the AOTK issues, but if you will kindly recall, I still went to bat for your return to the campaign as a valued player and community member despite your venomous responses after the incident of your removal as ARM. Later you did admit to a certain unjustness,and render an apology about your negetive responses as I hope Die Hard will do if his situation is corrected. I hope this may prove to be the case and that he will follow that example. Some called the AOTK " Karnak situation" a "lost cause" but it proved worth the effort, as you validated my efforts on your behalf. So don't let it arise again.

I also ask you to remember that Fluf and I were SFC2.net RM and A/RM respectively, and we did our best towards you, so please do not direct criticism towards the SFC2.net RMs without considering this.

I agree in your defence of CD and his rights to disagree, but I think I detected some holdover venom from the AOTK issue, this likely triggered Hooch's response, please let it drop.

Well, either 2 things can happen here, #1 you both give an apology for letting this misunderstanding become a minor Flame, and your heated words, and shake hands, or #2 you both start flaming me for playing peace broker or misunderstanding the issues at hand. I hope you both are men enough to do the former without a "him first attitude". If you can do this, I will hold you both in higher regard. ...........

Now lets get on with it and Bump this sucker!!!!!

my 2 cents plus tax.........

News:

Topic: Die Hard Re-banned (Read 72488 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

hobbesmaster

Karnak

Tantalus

ChrsLWlstr

SSCF Hooch

SSCF Hooch

Karnak

SSCF Hooch

Karnak

SSCF Hooch

DrSchreber

Toasty0

Karnak

Toasty0

Hale

Karnak

SSCF Hooch

Kroma_BaSyl

Stormbringer

KATChuutRitt

Topic: Die Hard Re-banned (Read 72488 times)